Selected article for: "potential source and study design"

Author: Chari, Divya A.; Workman, Alan D.; Chen, Jenny X.; Jung, David H.; Abdul-Aziz, Dunia; Kozin, Elliott D.; Remenschneider, Aaron K.; Lee, Daniel J.; Welling, D. Bradley; Bleier, Benjamin S.; Quesnel, Alicia M.
Title: Aerosol Dispersion During Mastoidectomy and Custom Mitigation Strategies for Otologic Surgery in the COVID-19 Era
  • Cord-id: jalup25c
  • Document date: 2020_7_14
  • ID: jalup25c
    Snippet: OBJECTIVE: To investigate small-particle aerosolization from mastoidectomy relevant to potential viral transmission and to test source-control mitigation strategies. STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric simulation. SETTING: Surgical simulation laboratory. METHODS: An optical particle size spectrometer was used to quantify 1- to 10-µm aerosols 30 cm from mastoid cortex drilling. Two barrier drapes were evaluated: OtoTent1, a drape sheet affixed to the microscope; OtoTent2, a custom-structured drape that encl
    Document: OBJECTIVE: To investigate small-particle aerosolization from mastoidectomy relevant to potential viral transmission and to test source-control mitigation strategies. STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric simulation. SETTING: Surgical simulation laboratory. METHODS: An optical particle size spectrometer was used to quantify 1- to 10-µm aerosols 30 cm from mastoid cortex drilling. Two barrier drapes were evaluated: OtoTent1, a drape sheet affixed to the microscope; OtoTent2, a custom-structured drape that enclosed the surgical field with specialized ports. RESULTS: Mastoid drilling without a barrier drape, with or without an aerosol-scavenging second suction, generated large amounts of 1- to 10-µm particulate. Drilling under OtoTent1 generated a high density of particles when compared with baseline environmental levels (P < .001, U = 107). By contrast, when drilling was conducted under OtoTent2, mean particle density remained at baseline. Adding a second suction inside OtoTent1 or OtoTent2 kept particle density at baseline levels. Significant aerosols were released upon removal of OtoTent1 or OtoTent2 despite a 60-second pause before drape removal after drilling (P < .001, U = 0, n = 10, 12; P < .001, U = 2, n = 12, 12, respectively). However, particle density did not increase above baseline when a second suction and a pause before removal were both employed. CONCLUSIONS: Mastoidectomy without a barrier, even when a second suction was added, generated substantial 1- to 10-µm aerosols. During drilling, large amounts of aerosols above baseline levels were detected with OtoTent1 but not OtoTent2. For both drapes, a second suction was an effective mitigation strategy during drilling. Last, the combination of a second suction and a pause before removal prevented aerosol escape during the removal of either drape.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • accuracy availability test and acute respiratory syndrome: 1
    • acute phase and adenovirus enterovirus: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute phase and adenovirus enterovirus parainfluenza: 1
    • acute phase and adenovirus enterovirus parainfluenza influenza: 1
    • acute respiratory syndrome and adenovirus enterovirus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute respiratory syndrome and adenovirus enterovirus parainfluenza: 1, 2
    • acute respiratory syndrome and adenovirus enterovirus parainfluenza influenza: 1
    • acute respiratory syndrome and adjunctive strategy: 1, 2
    • acute respiratory syndrome and living patient: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • acute respiratory syndrome and long term change: 1