Selected article for: "acid testing and acute infection"

Author: Meng, Qing-Bin; Peng, Jing-Jing; Wei, Xin; Yang, Jia-Yao; Li, Peng-Cheng; Qu, Zi-Wei; Xiong, Yong-Fen; Wu, Guang-Jiang; Hu, Zhi-Min; Yu, Jian-Chun; Su, Wen
Title: Clinical application of combined detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody and nucleic acid
  • Cord-id: fmkfo5ju
  • Document date: 2020_10_6
  • ID: fmkfo5ju
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: The global outbreak of human severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2 infection represents an urgent need for readily available, accurate and rapid diagnostic tests. Nucleic acid testing of respiratory tract specimens for SARS-CoV-2 is the current gold standard for diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the diagnostic accuracy of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests for detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid may be lower than
    Document: BACKGROUND: The global outbreak of human severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2 infection represents an urgent need for readily available, accurate and rapid diagnostic tests. Nucleic acid testing of respiratory tract specimens for SARS-CoV-2 is the current gold standard for diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the diagnostic accuracy of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests for detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid may be lower than optimal. The detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies should be used as a serological non-invasive tool for the diagnosis and management of SARS-CoV-2 infection. AIM: To investigate the diagnostic value of SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG and nucleic acid detection in COVID-19. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 652 suspected COVID-19 patients, and 206 non-COVID-19 patients in Wuhan Integrated TCM and Western Medicine Hospital. Data on SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid tests and serum antibody tests were collected to investigate the diagnostic value of nucleic acid RT-PCR test kits and immunoglobulin (Ig)M/IgG antibody test kits. The χ2 test was used to compare differences between categorical variables. A 95% confidence interval (CI) was provided by the Wilson score method. All analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States). RESULTS: Of the 652 suspected COVID-19 patients, 237 (36.3%) had positive nucleic acid tests, 311 (47.7%) were positive for IgM, and 592 (90.8%) were positive for IgG. There was a significant difference in the positive detection rate between the IgM and IgG test groups (P < 0.001). Using the RT-PCR results as a reference, the specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of IgM/IgG combined tests for SARS-CoV-2 infection were 98.5%, 95.8%, and 97.1%, respectively. Of the 415 suspected COVID-19 patients with negative nucleic acid test results, 366 had positive IgM/IgG tests with a positive detection rate of 88.2%. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that serological IgM/IgG antibody combined test had high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and can be used in combination with RT-PCR for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • accuracy sensitivity and acid testing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • accuracy sensitivity and acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • accuracy sensitivity and low concentration: 1, 2, 3
    • accuracy sensitivity high specificity and acid detection: 1, 2
    • accuracy sensitivity high specificity and acid testing: 1, 2
    • accuracy sensitivity high specificity and acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • accuracy sensitivity specificity and acid detection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • accuracy sensitivity specificity and acid testing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • accuracy sensitivity specificity and acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • accuracy sensitivity specificity and low concentration: 1, 2, 3
    • accuracy specificity and acid detection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • accuracy specificity and acid testing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • accuracy specificity and acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • accuracy specificity and low concentration: 1, 2, 3
    • accuracy specificity high sensitivity and acid detection: 1, 2
    • accuracy specificity high sensitivity and acid testing: 1, 2
    • accuracy specificity high sensitivity and acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • accurate sensitive and acid detection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    • accurate sensitive and acid testing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5