Author: Moghadas, Seyed M.; Shoukat, Affan; Fitzpatrick, Meagan C.; Wells, Chad R.; Sah, Pratha; Pandey, Abhishek; Sachs, Jeffrey D.; Wang, Zheng; Meyers, Lauren A.; Singer, Burton H.; Galvani, Alison P.
Title: Projecting hospital utilization during the COVID-19 outbreaks in the United States Cord-id: 0bbdn09j Document date: 2020_4_21
ID: 0bbdn09j
Snippet: In the wake of community coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmission in the United States, there is a growing public health concern regarding the adequacy of resources to treat infected cases. Hospital beds, intensive care units (ICUs), and ventilators are vital for the treatment of patients with severe illness. To project the timing of the outbreak peak and the number of ICU beds required at peak, we simulated a COVID-19 outbreak parameterized with the US population demographics. In scenar
Document: In the wake of community coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmission in the United States, there is a growing public health concern regarding the adequacy of resources to treat infected cases. Hospital beds, intensive care units (ICUs), and ventilators are vital for the treatment of patients with severe illness. To project the timing of the outbreak peak and the number of ICU beds required at peak, we simulated a COVID-19 outbreak parameterized with the US population demographics. In scenario analyses, we varied the delay from symptom onset to self-isolation, the proportion of symptomatic individuals practicing self-isolation, and the basic reproduction number R(0). Without self-isolation, when R(0) = 2.5, treatment of critically ill individuals at the outbreak peak would require 3.8 times more ICU beds than exist in the United States. Self-isolation by 20% of cases 24 h after symptom onset would delay and flatten the outbreak trajectory, reducing the number of ICU beds needed at the peak by 48.4% (interquartile range 46.4–50.3%), although still exceeding existing capacity. When R(0) = 2, twice as many ICU beds would be required at the peak of outbreak in the absence of self-isolation. In this scenario, the proportional impact of self-isolation within 24 h on reducing the peak number of ICU beds is substantially higher at 73.5% (interquartile range 71.4–75.3%). Our estimates underscore the inadequacy of critical care capacity to handle the burgeoning outbreak. Policies that encourage self-isolation, such as paid sick leave, may delay the epidemic peak, giving a window of time that could facilitate emergency mobilization to expand hospital capacity.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- acute respiratory syndrome and additional resource: 1, 2, 3, 4
- acute respiratory syndrome and admission prior: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute respiratory syndrome and admission prior time: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and local health department: 1, 2
- acute respiratory syndrome and local outbreak: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute respiratory syndrome and local transmission: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute respiratory syndrome and long term care facility: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
- acute respiratory syndrome and long term care facility resident: 1
- additional case and local outbreak: 1
- additional case and local transmission: 1, 2
- additional case and long term care facility: 1
- local health department and long term care facility: 1
- local outbreak and long term care facility: 1, 2
- local outbreak and long term care facility local outbreak: 1
- local transmission and long term care facility: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date