Selected article for: "care point and laboratory setting"

Author: Morshed, Muhammad; Sekirov, Inna; McLennan, Meghan; Levett, Paul N; Chahil, Navdeep; Mak, Annie; Carruthers, Erin; Pidduck, Tamara; Kustra, Jesse; Laley, Jonathan; Lee, Min-Kuang; Chu, Kenneth; Burgess, Fred; Vijh, Rohit; Willis, Lori; Wada, Ray; Blancaflor, Rosemarie; Boraston, Suni; Hayden, Althea; Krajden, Mel
Title: Comparative analysis of capillary versus venous blood for serologic detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies by rPOC lateral flow tests
  • Cord-id: gek3zdkj
  • Document date: 2021_1_28
  • ID: gek3zdkj
    Snippet: A comparison of rapid point of care serology tests using finger prick and venous blood was done on 278 participants. In a laboratory setting, IgG sensitivity neared 100%; however, IgG sensitivity dramatically dropped (82%) in field testing. Possible factors include finger prick volume variability, hemolysis, cassette readability and operator training.
    Document: A comparison of rapid point of care serology tests using finger prick and venous blood was done on 278 participants. In a laboratory setting, IgG sensitivity neared 100%; however, IgG sensitivity dramatically dropped (82%) in field testing. Possible factors include finger prick volume variability, hemolysis, cassette readability and operator training.

    Search related documents: