Selected article for: "effective surveillance and UK case"
Author: Po Yang; Jun Qi; Shuhao Zhang; Xulong Wang; Gaoshan Bi; Yun Yang; Bin Sheng
Title: Feasibility Study of Mitigation and Suppression Intervention Strategies for Controlling COVID-19 Outbreaks in London and Wuhan
  • Document date: 2020_4_4
    • ID: 7yzib4j0_46
    Snippet: Notably, the simulated situation of Wuhan, London and Hubei were same, it was mainly because we initialised the same value of confirmed cases as 3, and M = 15 in all cases. When taking highly effective surveillance and isolation, the transmission of COVID-19 was limited and controlled within a small group of population. The population difference would not affect the total infectious ones. But in the UK case with M = 12, low population density lim.....
    Document: Notably, the simulated situation of Wuhan, London and Hubei were same, it was mainly because we initialised the same value of confirmed cases as 3, and M = 15 in all cases. When taking highly effective surveillance and isolation, the transmission of COVID-19 was limited and controlled within a small group of population. The population difference would not affect the total infectious ones. But in the UK case with M = 12, low population density limited the effectiveness of surveillance and isolation, as a result of more infectious population. It implied another fact that to these countries with low population density, it was challenging to take high quality of intervention like surveillance and isolation.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • confirm case and population density: 1
    • high quality and infectious one: 1, 2
    • high quality and infectious population: 1, 2, 3
    • high quality and population density: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • high quality and population difference: 1, 2
    • highly effective surveillance and isolation highly effective surveillance: 1
    • highly effective surveillance and isolation surveillance: 1
    • highly effective surveillance and population density: 1
    • infectious one and population density: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • infectious one and population difference: 1
    • infectious population and isolation surveillance: 1, 2, 3
    • infectious population and low population density: 1, 2
    • infectious population and population density: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • infectious population and population difference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • infectious population result and low population density: 1
    • infectious population result and population density: 1
    • isolation highly effective surveillance and population density: 1
    • isolation surveillance and population density: 1
    • low population density and population density: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25