Author: Sumner, Rachel C.; Kinsella, Elaine L.
Title: Grace Under Pressure: Resilience, Burnout, and Wellbeing in Frontline Workers in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Cord-id: ercxguge Document date: 2021_1_27
ID: ercxguge
Snippet: The coronavirus pandemic has necessitated extraordinary human resilience in order to preserve and prolong life and social order. Risks to health and even life are being confronted by workers in health and social care, as well as those in roles previously never defined as “frontline,†such as individuals working in community supply chain sectors. The strategy adopted by the United Kingdom (UK) government in facing the challenges of the pandemic was markedly different from other countries. The
Document: The coronavirus pandemic has necessitated extraordinary human resilience in order to preserve and prolong life and social order. Risks to health and even life are being confronted by workers in health and social care, as well as those in roles previously never defined as “frontline,†such as individuals working in community supply chain sectors. The strategy adopted by the United Kingdom (UK) government in facing the challenges of the pandemic was markedly different from other countries. The present study set out to examine what variables were associated with resilience, burnout, and wellbeing in all sectors of frontline workers, and whether or not these differed between the UK and Republic of Ireland (RoI). Individuals were eligible if they were a frontline worker (in health and social care, community supply chain, or other emergency services) in the UK or RoI during the pandemic. Part of a larger, longitudinal study, the participants completed an online survey to assess various aspects of their daily and working lives, along with their attitudes toward their government’s handling of the crisis, and measurement of psychological variables associated with heroism (altruism, meaning in life, and resilient coping). A total of 1,305 participants (N = 869, 66.6% from the UK) provided sufficient data for analysis. UK-based workers reported lower wellbeing than the RoI-based participants. In multivariate models, both psychological and pandemic-related variables were associated with levels of resilience, burnout, and wellbeing in these workers, but which pandemic-related variables were associated with outcomes differed depending on the country. The judgment of lower timeliness in their government’s response to the pandemic appeared to be a key driver of each outcome for the UK-based frontline workers. These findings provide initial evidence that the different strategies adopted by each country may be associated with the overall wellbeing of frontline workers, with higher detriment observed in the UK. The judgment of the relatively slow response of the UK government to instigate their pandemic measures appears to be associated with lower resilience, higher burnout, and lower wellbeing in frontline workers in the UK.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- acute phase and long term consequence: 1, 2, 3
- acute phase and long term impact: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- acute phase and longitudinal analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4
- acute phase and longitudinal study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- acute phase and lower score: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- acute phase pandemic and lockdown pandemic: 1, 2, 3
- acute phase pandemic and long term impact: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and additional factor: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- acute respiratory syndrome and additional predictor: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and live memory: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and lockdown measure: 1, 2, 3
- acute respiratory syndrome and lockdown pandemic: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59
- acute respiratory syndrome and lockdown pandemic period: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- acute respiratory syndrome and lockdown status: 1, 2, 3
- acute respiratory syndrome and long term consequence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- acute respiratory syndrome and long term impact: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
- acute respiratory syndrome and longitudinal analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29
- acute respiratory syndrome and longitudinal study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
- acute respiratory syndrome and low resilience: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date