CovRNN - A recurrent neural network model for predicting outcomes of COVID-19 patients: model development and validation using EHR data

Rasmy, L.; Nigo, M.; Kannadath, B. S.; Xie, Z.; Mao, B.; Patel, K.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, W.; Ross, A. M.; Xu, H.; Zhi, D.

Background: Predicting outcomes of COVID-19 patients at an early stage is critical for optimized clinical care and resource management, especially during a pandemic. Although multiple machine learning models have been proposed to address this issue, based on the need for extensive data pre-processing and feature engineering, these models have not been validated or implemented outside of the original study site. Methods: In this study, we propose CovRNN, recurrent neural network (RNN)-based models to predict COVID-19 patients' outcomes, using their available electronic health record (EHR) data on admission, without the need for specific feature selection or missing data imputation. CovRNN is designed to predict three outcomes: in-hospital mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, and long length of stay (LOS >7 days). Predictions are made for time-to-event risk scores (survival prediction) and all-time risk scores (binary prediction). Our models were trained and validated using heterogeneous and de-identified data of 247,960 COVID-19 patients from 87 healthcare systems, derived from the Cerner(R) Real-World Dataset (CRWD). External validation was performed using three test sets (approximately 53,000 patients). Further, the transferability of CovRNN was validated using 36,140 de-identified patients' data derived from the Optum(R) de-identified COVID-19 Electronic Health Record v.1015 dataset (2007-2020). Findings: CovRNN shows higher performance than do traditional models. It achieved an area under the receiving operating characteristic (AUROC) of 93% for mortality and mechanical ventilation predictions on the CRWD test set (vs. 91.5% and 90% for light gradient boost machine (LGBM) and logistic regression (LR), respectively) and 86.5% for prediction of LOS > 7 days (vs. 81.7% and 80% for LGBM and LR, respectively). For survival prediction, CovRNN achieved a C-index of 86% for mortality and 92.6% for mechanical ventilation. External validation confirmed AUROCs in similar ranges. Interpretation: Trained on a large heterogeneous real-world dataset, our CovRNN model showed high prediction accuracy, good calibration, and transferability through consistently good performance on multiple external datasets. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of a COVID-19 predictive model that delivers high accuracy without the need for complex feature engineering.