Selected article for: "body weight and median age"

Author: Sadeghipour, Parham; Talasaz, Azita H; Rashidi, Farid; Sharif-Kashani, Babak; Beigmohammadi, Mohammad Taghi; Farrokhpour, Mohsen; Sezavar, Seyed Hashem; Payandemehr, Pooya; Dabbagh, Ali; Moghadam, Keivan Gohari; Jamalkhani, Sepehr; Khalili, Hossein; Yadollahzadeh, Mahdi; Riahi, Taghi; Rezaeifar, Parisa; Tahamtan, Ouria; Matin, Samira; Abedini, Atefeh; Lookzadeh, Somayeh; Rahmani, Hamid; Zoghi, Elnaz; Mohammadi, Keyhan; Sadeghipour, Pardis; Abri, Homa; Tabrizi, Sanaz; Mousavian, Seyed Masoud; Shahmirzaei, Shaghayegh; Bakhshandeh, Hooman; Amin, Ahmad; Rafiee, Farnaz; Baghizadeh, Elahe; Mohebbi, Bahram; Parhizgar, Seyed Ehsan; Aliannejad, Rasoul; Eslami, Vahid; Kashefizadeh, Alireza; Kakavand, Hessam; Hosseini, Seyed Hossein; Shafaghi, Shadi; Ghazi, Samrand Fattah; Najafi, Atabak; Jimenez, David; Gupta, Aakriti; Madhavan, Mahesh V; Sethi, Sanjum S; Parikh, Sahil A; Monreal, Manuel; Hadavand, Naser; Hajighasemi, Alireza; Maleki, Majid; Sadeghian, Saeed; Piazza, Gregory; Kirtane, Ajay J; Van Tassell, Benjamin W; Dobesh, Paul P; Stone, Gregg W; Lip, Gregory Y H; Krumholz, Harlan M; Goldhaber, Samuel Z; Bikdeli, Behnood
Title: Effect of Intermediate-Dose vs Standard-Dose Prophylactic Anticoagulation on Thrombotic Events, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Treatment, or Mortality Among Patients With COVID-19 Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: The INSPIRATION Randomized Clinical Trial.
  • Cord-id: g5w1qezq
  • Document date: 2021_3_18
  • ID: g5w1qezq
    Snippet: Importance Thrombotic events are commonly reported in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Limited data exist to guide the intensity of antithrombotic prophylaxis. Objective To evaluate the effects of intermediate-dose vs standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation among patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Design, Setting, and Participants Multicenter randomized trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design performed in 10 academic centers in Iran comparing intermediate-dos
    Document: Importance Thrombotic events are commonly reported in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Limited data exist to guide the intensity of antithrombotic prophylaxis. Objective To evaluate the effects of intermediate-dose vs standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation among patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Design, Setting, and Participants Multicenter randomized trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design performed in 10 academic centers in Iran comparing intermediate-dose vs standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (first hypothesis) and statin therapy vs matching placebo (second hypothesis; not reported in this article) among adult patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19. Patients were recruited between July 29, 2020, and November 19, 2020. The final follow-up date for the 30-day primary outcome was December 19, 2020. Interventions Intermediate-dose (enoxaparin, 1 mg/kg daily) (n = 276) vs standard prophylactic anticoagulation (enoxaparin, 40 mg daily) (n = 286), with modification according to body weight and creatinine clearance. The assigned treatments were planned to be continued until completion of 30-day follow-up. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of venous or arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or mortality within 30 days, assessed in randomized patients who met the eligibility criteria and received at least 1 dose of the assigned treatment. Prespecified safety outcomes included major bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (type 3 or 5 definition), powered for noninferiority (a noninferiority margin of 1.8 based on odds ratio), and severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <20 ×103/µL). All outcomes were blindly adjudicated. Results Among 600 randomized patients, 562 (93.7%) were included in the primary analysis (median [interquartile range] age, 62 [50-71] years; 237 [42.2%] women). The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 126 patients (45.7%) in the intermediate-dose group and 126 patients (44.1%) in the standard-dose prophylaxis group (absolute risk difference, 1.5% [95% CI, -6.6% to 9.8%]; odds ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.76-1.48]; P = .70). Major bleeding occurred in 7 patients (2.5%) in the intermediate-dose group and 4 patients (1.4%) in the standard-dose prophylaxis group (risk difference, 1.1% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 3.4%]; odds ratio, 1.83 [1-sided 97.5% CI, 0.00-5.93]), not meeting the noninferiority criteria (P for noninferiority >.99). Severe thrombocytopenia occurred only in patients assigned to the intermediate-dose group (6 vs 0 patients; risk difference, 2.2% [95% CI, 0.4%-3.8%]; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance Among patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19, intermediate-dose prophylactic anticoagulation, compared with standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation, did not result in a significant difference in the primary outcome of a composite of adjudicated venous or arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or mortality within 30 days. These results do not support the routine empirical use of intermediate-dose prophylactic anticoagulation in unselected patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04486508.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • Try single phrases listed below for: 1