Author: Chaolong Wang; Li Liu; Xingjie Hao; Huan Guo; Qi Wang; Jiao Huang; Na He; Hongjie Yu; Xihong Lin; An Pan; Sheng Wei; Tangchun Wu
Title: Evolving Epidemiology and Impact of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions on the Outbreak of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China Document date: 2020_3_6
ID: 944pn0k9_43
Snippet: is the (which was not peer-reviewed) The copyright holder for this preprint . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.03.20030593 doi: medRxiv preprint delay in the predicted ending date of the epidemic when taking the unascertained cases into account (Table S4) . Therefore, understanding the proportion of unascertained cases and the rate of asymptomatic spread will be critical for pandemic prevention of Covid-19, including prioritization the surveillanc.....
Document: is the (which was not peer-reviewed) The copyright holder for this preprint . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.03.20030593 doi: medRxiv preprint delay in the predicted ending date of the epidemic when taking the unascertained cases into account (Table S4) . Therefore, understanding the proportion of unascertained cases and the rate of asymptomatic spread will be critical for pandemic prevention of Covid-19, including prioritization the surveillance and control measures. 23, 28 We demonstrated that the series of interventions has been highly effective in controlling the epidemic in Wuhan. Our estimate of R t =3.88 for the first period reflected the basic reproductive number R 0 as few interventions had been implemented by then. Some previous studies have reported varied R 0 (range 1.40 to 6.49 with a mean of 3.28) due to different data sources, time periods and statistical methods. 29 Even using the same dataset of the first 425 patients in Wuhan, an early study reported a R 0 of 2.20 based on the growth rate of the epidemic curve and the serial interval, 8 while a recent analysis based on a transmission network model reported a R 0 of 3.58, similar to our estimate. The transmissibility was higher than that for the SARS-CoV in 2003 (from 2.2 to 3.6), 30 and was consistent with the rapid spreading of Covid-19. Nevertheless, by taking drastic social distancing measures and policies of controlling the source of infection, with the tremendous joint efforts from the government, healthcare workers, and the people (Fig. 1) , R t was substantially reduced to 0.32 in Wuhan after February 2, which was encouraging for the global efforts fighting against the Covid-19 outbreak using traditional non-pharmaceutical measures. 31 Some limitations of this study need to be noted. First, while our model prediction . CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license It is made available under a author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- asymptomatic spread and control surveillance: 1, 2, 3
- asymptomatic spread and early study: 1, 2
- asymptomatic spread and epidemic curve: 1
- asymptomatic spread and growth rate: 1, 2, 3
- asymptomatic spread and infection source: 1, 2, 3, 4
- cc NC ND International license and distancing measure: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- cc NC ND International license and early study: 1
- cc NC ND International license and end date: 1
- cc NC ND International license and epidemic curve: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- cc NC ND International license and growth rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- cc NC ND International license and healthcare worker: 1
- control surveillance and early study: 1, 2, 3
- control surveillance and epidemic curve: 1, 2
- control surveillance and global effort: 1
- control surveillance and growth rate: 1
- control surveillance and healthcare worker: 1
- distancing measure and epidemic curve: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- distancing measure and growth rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- distancing measure and healthcare worker: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date