Author: Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez; Diana Buitrago-Garcia; Daniel Simancas-Racines; Paula Zambrano-Achig; Rosa del Campo; Agustin Ciapponi; Omar Sued; Laura Martinez-Garcia; Anne Rutjes; Nicola Low; Jose A Perez-Molina; Javier Zamora
Title: FALSE-NEGATIVE RESULTS OF INITIAL RT-PCR ASSAYS FOR COVID-19: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Document date: 2020_4_21
ID: g8h6trql_22
Snippet: For the selection of potential studies, one reviewer screened the search results based on the title 152 and abstract, with additional verification by a second reviewer (no-independent verification). We 153 retrieved the full-text copy of each study assessed as potentially eligible, and pairs of reviewers 154 confirmed eligibility according to the selection criteria (non-independent verification). In case of 155 disagreements we reached consensus .....
Document: For the selection of potential studies, one reviewer screened the search results based on the title 152 and abstract, with additional verification by a second reviewer (no-independent verification). We 153 retrieved the full-text copy of each study assessed as potentially eligible, and pairs of reviewers 154 confirmed eligibility according to the selection criteria (non-independent verification). In case of 155 disagreements we reached consensus by discussion. For data extraction one reviewer extracted 156 qualitative and quantitative data from eligible studies. An additional reviewer checked all the 157 extracted information for accuracy (non-independent verification of data extraction). 158
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- consensus reach and discussion consensus reach: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- consensus reach and potential study: 1
- eligible study and potential study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- eligible study and selection criterion: 1
- extract information and potential study: 1
- independent verification and non independent verification: 1, 2, 3, 4
- independent verification and potential study: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date