Selected article for: "bowel disease and prospective study"

Author: Glasbey, J.; on behalf of the COVIDSurg Collaborative,
Title: 1566MO Resilience of elective cancer surgery systems during COVID-19 lockdowns: International, prospective cohort study of planned surgery for 15 tumour types in 61 countries
  • Cord-id: ir03tp73
  • Document date: 2021_9_30
  • ID: ir03tp73
    Snippet: Background: Surgery is the main modality of cure for solid cancers and was prioritised to continue even during SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks. This study aimed to identify immediate areas for system strengthening by comparing the delivery of elective cancer surgery during COVID-19 in periods of lockdown versus light restriction. Methods: This international, prospective cohort study enrolled patients with 15 cancer types who had a decision for surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic up to 31st August 2020. Av
    Document: Background: Surgery is the main modality of cure for solid cancers and was prioritised to continue even during SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks. This study aimed to identify immediate areas for system strengthening by comparing the delivery of elective cancer surgery during COVID-19 in periods of lockdown versus light restriction. Methods: This international, prospective cohort study enrolled patients with 15 cancer types who had a decision for surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic up to 31st August 2020. Average national Oxford COVID-19 Stringency Index scores were calculated for each patient during the period they were awaiting surgery, classified into light restrictions (index <20), moderate lockdowns (20-60), and full lockdowns (>60). The primary outcome was the non-operation rate (proportion of patients who did not undergo planned surgery). Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to explore the associations between lockdowns and non-operation. Results: From 20,006 patients (466 hospitals, 61 countries), 9.1% did not receive surgery after a minimum of 3-months’ follow up (median:23 weeks, IQR:16 to 30 weeks). Light restrictions were associated with a 0.6% non-operation rate, moderate lockdowns 5.5% (adjusted hazard ratio:0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.84, p<0.001), and full lockdowns with a 15.0% rate (HR:0.51, 0.50-0.53). In sensitivity analyses, this effect was independent of local SARS-CoV-2 rates. Each additional week in lockdown led to a 9% reduction in the likelihood in a patient undergoing their cancer operation. Frail patients, those with advanced cancer, and those in lower-income settings were particularly vulnerable to lockdown effects. Surgery beyond 12-weeks from diagnosis increased during lockdowns (9.1% in light restrictions, 10.4% moderate lockdowns, 23.8% full lockdowns). Conclusions: Cancer surgery systems worldwide were fragile to lockdowns, with one in seven patients not undergoing planned surgery and more preoperative delays. During current and future periods of societal restriction, the resilience of elective surgery systems requires strengthening, which may include ring-fenced surgical units and critical care capacity. Clinical trial identification: NCT04384926. Legal entity responsible for the study: COVIDSurg Collaborate, University of Birmingham, UK. Funding: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Global Health Research Unit, the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Bowel and Cancer Research, Bowel Disease Research Foundation, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, British Association of Surgical Oncology, British Gynaecological Cancer Society, European Society of Coloproctology, Medtronic, NIHR Academy, Sarcoma UK, The Urology Foundation, Vascular Society for Great Britain and Ireland, and Yorkshire Cancer Research. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • ab antibody and active cancer treatment: 1, 2
    • ab antibody and logistic regression: 1
    • ab antibody and low income: 1
    • ab response and active cancer treatment: 1
    • ab response and additional blood: 1
    • active cancer treatment and additional recovery prognostic factor: 1
    • active cancer treatment and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • active cancer treatment and low income: 1, 2
    • additional blood and logistic regression: 1, 2
    • additional blood and low income: 1
    • additional recovery prognostic factor and logistic regression: 1
    • additional week and logistic regression: 1
    • additional week and low income: 1, 2
    • lockdown effect and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • lockdown effect and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • lockdown fragile and low income: 1, 2
    • lockdown lead and logistic regression: 1
    • lockdown lead and low income: 1, 2
    • lockdown moderate lockdown and logistic regression: 1