Selected article for: "bias low risk and low risk"
Author: Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez; Diana Buitrago-Garcia; Daniel Simancas-Racines; Paula Zambrano-Achig; Rosa del Campo; Agustin Ciapponi; Omar Sued; Laura Martinez-Garcia; Anne Rutjes; Nicola Low; Jose A Perez-Molina; Javier Zamora
Title: FALSE-NEGATIVE RESULTS OF INITIAL RT-PCR ASSAYS FOR COVID-19: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
  • Document date: 2020_4_21
    • ID: g8h6trql_43
    Snippet: We use the range of false-negative proportions to develop a summary of findings following the 251 GRADE approach. The quality of the evidence was judged to be very low due to issues related to the 252 risk of bias, indirectness, and inconsistency ( Figure 5) . We illustrate the consequences of the range 253 of false-negative proportions in a population of 100 tested, according to three different prevalence 254 seen in the current clinical practic.....
    Document: We use the range of false-negative proportions to develop a summary of findings following the 251 GRADE approach. The quality of the evidence was judged to be very low due to issues related to the 252 risk of bias, indirectness, and inconsistency ( Figure 5) . We illustrate the consequences of the range 253 of false-negative proportions in a population of 100 tested, according to three different prevalence 254 seen in the current clinical practice for participant stakeholders (30%, 50%, and 80%) ( Figure 5 ). 255

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • clinical practice and evidence quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • clinical practice and false negative proportion: 1, 2
    • clinical practice and grade approach: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
    • different prevalence and evidence quality: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • different prevalence and grade approach: 1
    • different prevalence and inconsistency indirectness: 1
    • different prevalence and inconsistency indirectness bias: 1
    • evidence quality and grade approach: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • evidence quality and inconsistency indirectness: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • evidence quality and inconsistency indirectness bias: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • false negative proportion and grade approach: 1, 2
    • false negative proportion and inconsistency indirectness: 1, 2
    • false negative proportion and inconsistency indirectness bias: 1, 2
    • grade approach and inconsistency indirectness: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • grade approach and inconsistency indirectness bias: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5