Author: Gupta, Tejpal; Kannan, Sadhana; Kalra, Babusha; Thakkar, Prafulla
Title: Systematic review and metaâ€analysis of randomised controlled trials testing the safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVIDâ€19): Evidenceâ€base for practise and implications for research Cord-id: 87fyri8c Document date: 2021_6_29
ID: 87fyri8c
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Despite scientific advances, there is no effective medical therapy for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVIDâ€19). This systematic review and metaâ€analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma therapy in COVIDâ€19. METHODS: This review was carried out in accordance with Cochrane methodology including risk of bias assessment and grading of the quality of evidence. Only prospective clinical trials randomly assigning COVIDâ€19 patients to convalescent plasma p
Document: BACKGROUND: Despite scientific advances, there is no effective medical therapy for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVIDâ€19). This systematic review and metaâ€analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma therapy in COVIDâ€19. METHODS: This review was carried out in accordance with Cochrane methodology including risk of bias assessment and grading of the quality of evidence. Only prospective clinical trials randomly assigning COVIDâ€19 patients to convalescent plasma plus standard of care therapy (test arm) versus placebo/standard of care (control arm) were included. Two reviewers independently read each preprint/publication and extracted relevant data from individual studies. Data were pooled using the randomâ€effects model and expressed as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A total of 13 206 patients from 12 randomised controlled trials were included. There was no significant difference in clinical improvement rate (RR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.98–1.02, p = 0.96) or time to clinical improvement (median difference of 1.08 days with 95% CI ranging from −0.15 to +2.30 days) between convalescent plasma versus placebo/standard of care therapy. The use of convalescent plasma was not associated with significantly reduced risk of death (RR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.65–1.02, p = 0.08). Reassuringly, overall incidence of infusionâ€related serious adverse events was low (3.25%) and not significantly different (RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.93–1.40, p = 0.22) for convalescent plasma transfusion compared to placebo/standard of care therapy. CONCLUSIONS: There is low to moderate certainty evidence that the addition of convalescent plasma to current standard of care therapy is generally safe but, does not result in any significant clinical benefit or reduction of mortality in COVIDâ€19.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date