Selected article for: "retrospective study and treatment discharge"

Author: Zanforlin, Alessandro; Strapazzon, Giacomo; Falk, Markus; Gallina, Valentina; Viteritti, Antonio; Valzolgher, Laura; La Guardia, Mario; Ferro, Federica; Pagani, Leonardo; Vezzali, Norberto
Title: Lung Ultrasound in the Emergency Department for Early Identification of COVID-19 Pneumonia
  • Cord-id: l55vb7ah
  • Document date: 2020_12_7
  • ID: l55vb7ah
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic overwhelming the health care systems worldwide. Lung ultrasound (LUS) use has been proposed to identify suspected COVID-19 patients and direct them to the isolation area in the emergency department (ED) or to discharge them for outpatient treatment. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to retrospectively investigate the use of LUS in the ED to identify COVID-19 pneumonia (CP). METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center study including all
    Document: BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic overwhelming the health care systems worldwide. Lung ultrasound (LUS) use has been proposed to identify suspected COVID-19 patients and direct them to the isolation area in the emergency department (ED) or to discharge them for outpatient treatment. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to retrospectively investigate the use of LUS in the ED to identify COVID-19 pneumonia (CP). METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center study including all patients accessing the ED who underwent LUS examination for suspicion of COVID-19 during the initial outbreak. Demographics, clinical parameters, laboratory values, imaging features, and outcome variables were collected. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: A total of 41% patients were COVID-19-positive; 67% of them were diagnosed with CP. The ROC curve of the LUS score showed an area under the curve of 0.837 (95% CI 0.75–0.92) and with a cutoff value ≥3 identified 28 of 31 patients with CP and 11 of 15 without (sensitivity 90%, 95% CI 74–97% specificity 75%, 95% CI 56–76%). LUS in combination with nasopharyngeal swab has a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 74–97%) and a specificity of 61% (95% CI 44–67%). CONCLUSIONS: LUS is a promising technique for early identification of CP in patients who accessed the ED in an active epidemic time. The LUS score shows a sensitivity of 90% for CP, allowing to quickly direct patients with COVID-19 to the ED isolation area or to discharge them for outpatient treatment.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abnormal imaging and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • abnormal imaging and logistic regression analysis: 1
    • accurately quantify and additional test: 1
    • accurately quantify and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
    • acquisition protocol and acute respiratory distress syndrome: 1
    • acquisition protocol and logistic regression: 1
    • active epidemic and acute epidemic: 1, 2
    • active epidemic and acute respiratory distress syndrome: 1
    • active epidemic and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
    • acute epidemic and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    • acute epidemic and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and additional test: 1
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and logistic regression probability: 1
    • additional test and logistic regression: 1, 2
    • additional test and logistic regression analysis: 1