Selected article for: "model performance and training validation"

Author: Woo, Sang H.; Rios-Diaz, Arturo J.; Kubey, Alan A.; Cheney-Peters, Dianna R.; Ackermann, Lily L.; Chalikonda, Divya M.; Venkataraman, Chantel M.; Riley, Joshua M.; Baram, Michael
Title: Development and Validation of a Web-Based Severe COVID-19 Risk Prediction Model
  • Cord-id: 88ri98t2
  • Document date: 2021_5_23
  • ID: 88ri98t2
    Snippet: Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) carries high morbidity and mortality globally. Identification of patients at risk for clinical deterioration upon presentation would aid in triaging, prognostication, and allocation of resources and experimental treatments. Research Question: Can we develop and validate a web-based risk prediction model for identification of patients who may develop severe COVID-19, defined as intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and/or deat
    Document: Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) carries high morbidity and mortality globally. Identification of patients at risk for clinical deterioration upon presentation would aid in triaging, prognostication, and allocation of resources and experimental treatments. Research Question: Can we develop and validate a web-based risk prediction model for identification of patients who may develop severe COVID-19, defined as intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and/or death? Methods: This retrospective cohort study reviewed 415 patients admitted to a large urban academic medical center and community hospitals. Covariates included demographic, clinical, and laboratory data. The independent association of predictors with severe COVID-19 was determined using multivariable logistic regression. A derivation cohort (n=311, 75%) was used to develop the prediction models. The models were tested by a validation cohort (n=104, 25%). Results: The median age was 66 years (Interquartile range [IQR] 54-77) and the majority were male (55%) and non-White (65.8%). The 14-day severe COVID-19 rate was 39.3%; 31.7% required ICU, 24.6% mechanical ventilation, and 21.2% died. Machine learning algorithms and clinical judgment were used to improve model performance and clinical utility, resulting in the selection of eight predictors: age, sex, dyspnea, diabetes mellitus, troponin, C-reactive protein, D-dimer, and aspartate aminotransferase. The discriminative ability was excellent for both the severe COVID-19 (training area under the curve [AUC]=0.82, validation AUC=0.82) and mortality (training AUC= 0.85, validation AUC=0.81) models. These models were incorporated into a mobile-friendly website. Interpretation: This web-based risk prediction model can be used at the bedside for prediction of severe COVID-19 using data mostly available at the time of presentation.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • academic center and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • academic center and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • academic medical center and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • academic medical center and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • accurate triage and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
    • accurate triage and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • adjusted odd and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • adjusted odd ratio and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • admission dimer and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • admission dimer and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • logistic regression and machine learning modeling: 1, 2, 3