Author: Tanboğa, Ibrahim Halil; Canpolat, Uğur; Çetin, Elif Hande Özcan; Kundi, Harun; Çelik, Osman; Çağlayan, Murat; Ata, Naim; Özeke, Özcan; Çay, Serkan; Kaymaz, Cihangir; Topaloğlu, Serkan
Title: Development and validation of clinical prediction model to estimate the probability of death in hospitalized patients with COVIDâ€19: Insights from a nationwide database Cord-id: gjhfo15c Document date: 2021_2_10
ID: gjhfo15c
Snippet: In the current study, we aimed to develop and validate a model, based on our nationwide centralized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVIDâ€19) database for predicting death. We conducted an observational study (CORONATIONâ€TR registry). All patients hospitalized with COVIDâ€19 in Turkey between March 11 and June 22, 2020 were included. We developed the model and validated both temporal and geographical models. Model performances were assessed by area under the curveâ€receiver operating characteris
Document: In the current study, we aimed to develop and validate a model, based on our nationwide centralized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVIDâ€19) database for predicting death. We conducted an observational study (CORONATIONâ€TR registry). All patients hospitalized with COVIDâ€19 in Turkey between March 11 and June 22, 2020 were included. We developed the model and validated both temporal and geographical models. Model performances were assessed by area under the curveâ€receiver operating characteristic (AUCâ€ROC or câ€index), R (2), and calibration plots. The study population comprised a total of 60,980 hospitalized COVIDâ€19 patients. Of these patients, 7688 (13%) were transferred to intensive care unit, 4867 patients (8.0%) required mechanical ventilation, and 2682 patients (4.0%) died. Advanced age, increased levels of lactate dehydrogenase, Câ€reactive protein, neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio, creatinine, albumine, and Dâ€dimer levels, and pneumonia on computed tomography, diabetes mellitus, and heart failure status at admission were found to be the strongest predictors of death at 30 days in the multivariable logistic regression model (area under the curveâ€receiver operating characteristic = 0.942; 95% confidence interval: 0.939–0.945; R (2) = .457). There were also favorable temporal and geographic validations. We developed and validated the prediction model to identify inâ€hospital deaths in all hospitalized COVIDâ€19 patients. Our model achieved reasonable performances in both temporal and geographic validations.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- accurate simple and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
- admission time and liver disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
- admission time and local hospital: 1, 2, 3
- admission time and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- admission time and longitudinal cohort: 1
- admission time and longitudinal cohort study: 1
- liver disease and local hospital: 1, 2
- liver disease and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- liver disease and low sample size: 1
- local hospital and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- logistic regression and longitudinal cohort: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- logistic regression and longitudinal cohort study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- logistic regression and low sample size: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date