Author: O'Reilly, GM; Mitchell, RD; Mitra, B; Akhlaghi, H; Tran, V; Furyk, J; Buntine, P; Bannonâ€Murphy, H; Amos, T; Udaya Kumar, M; Perkins, E; Prentice, Alexandra; Szwarcberg, Olivia; Loughman, A; Lowry, N; Colwell, S; Noonan, MP; Hiller, R; Paton, A; Smit, D; Cameron, PA
Title: Epidemiology and clinical features of emergency department patients with suspected and confirmed COVIDâ€19: A multisite report from the COVED Quality Improvement Project for July 2020 (COVEDâ€3) Cord-id: jwy6k0ih Document date: 2020_9_21
ID: jwy6k0ih
Snippet: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology and clinical features of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected and confirmed COVIDâ€19. METHODS: The COVIDâ€19 Emergency Department (COVED) Project is an ongoing prospective cohort study in Australian EDs. This analysis presents data from eight sites across Victoria and Tasmania for July 2020 (during Australia's ‘second wave’). All adult patients who met criteria for ‘suspected COVIDâ€19’ a
Document: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology and clinical features of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected and confirmed COVIDâ€19. METHODS: The COVIDâ€19 Emergency Department (COVED) Project is an ongoing prospective cohort study in Australian EDs. This analysis presents data from eight sites across Victoria and Tasmania for July 2020 (during Australia's ‘second wave’). All adult patients who met criteria for ‘suspected COVIDâ€19’ and underwent testing for SARSâ€CoVâ€2 in the ED were eligible for inclusion. Study outcomes included a positive SARSâ€CoVâ€2 test result and mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: In the period 1 to 31 July 2020, there were 30 378 presentations to the participating EDs and 2917 (9.6%; 95% CI: 9.3–9.9) underwent testing for SARSâ€CoVâ€2. Of these, 50 (2%) patients returned a positive result. Among positive cases, two (4%) received mechanical ventilation during their hospital admission compared to 45 (2%) of the SARSâ€CoVâ€2 negative patients (OR 1.7 [95% CI: 0.4–7.3], p = 0.47). Two (4%) SARSâ€CoVâ€2 positive patients died in hospital compared to 46 (2%) of the SARSâ€CoVâ€2 negative patients (OR 1.7 [0.4–7.1] p = 0.49). Strong clinical predictors of a positive result included selfâ€reported fever, nonâ€smoking status, bilateral infiltrates on CXR, and absence of a leucocytosis on first ED blood tests (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective multiâ€site study from July 2020, a substantial proportion of ED patients required SARSâ€CoVâ€2 testing, isolation and enhanced infection prevention and control precautions. Presence of SARSâ€CoVâ€2 on nasopharyngeal swab was not associated with death or mechanical ventilation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- long period and low likely: 1, 2, 3
- long period and low positive test rate: 1
- long period and low remain: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date