Selected article for: "benefit risk and informed consent"

Author: Jamrozik, Euzebiusz; Littler, Katherine; Bull, Susan; Emerson, Claudia; Kang, Gagandeep; Kapulu, Melissa; Rey, Elena; Saenz, Carla; Shah, Seema; Smith, Peter G; Upshur, Ross; Weijer, Charles; Selgelid, Michael J
Title: Key criteria for the ethical acceptability of COVID-19 human challenge studies: Report of a WHO Working Group
  • Cord-id: e8fx5o49
  • Document date: 2020_10_28
  • ID: e8fx5o49
    Snippet: This report of WHO Working Group for Guidance on Human Challenge Studies in COVID-19 outlines ethical standards for COVID-19 challenge studies. It includes eight Key Criteria related to scientific justification, risk-benefit assessment, consultation and engagement, co-ordination of research, site selection, participant selection, expert review, and informed consent. The document aims to provide comprehensive guidance to scientists, research ethics committees, funders, policymakers, and regulator
    Document: This report of WHO Working Group for Guidance on Human Challenge Studies in COVID-19 outlines ethical standards for COVID-19 challenge studies. It includes eight Key Criteria related to scientific justification, risk-benefit assessment, consultation and engagement, co-ordination of research, site selection, participant selection, expert review, and informed consent. The document aims to provide comprehensive guidance to scientists, research ethics committees, funders, policymakers, and regulators in deliberations regarding SARS-CoV-2 challenge studies by outlining key criteria that would need to be satisfied in order for such studies to be ethically acceptable.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • absolute risk and additional risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • accurate assessment and additional risk: 1