Author: Jamrozik, Euzebiusz; Littler, Katherine; Bull, Susan; Emerson, Claudia; Kang, Gagandeep; Kapulu, Melissa; Rey, Elena; Saenz, Carla; Shah, Seema; Smith, Peter G; Upshur, Ross; Weijer, Charles; Selgelid, Michael J
Title: Key criteria for the ethical acceptability of COVID-19 human challenge studies: Report of a WHO Working Group Cord-id: e8fx5o49 Document date: 2020_10_28
ID: e8fx5o49
Snippet: This report of WHO Working Group for Guidance on Human Challenge Studies in COVID-19 outlines ethical standards for COVID-19 challenge studies. It includes eight Key Criteria related to scientific justification, risk-benefit assessment, consultation and engagement, co-ordination of research, site selection, participant selection, expert review, and informed consent. The document aims to provide comprehensive guidance to scientists, research ethics committees, funders, policymakers, and regulator
Document: This report of WHO Working Group for Guidance on Human Challenge Studies in COVID-19 outlines ethical standards for COVID-19 challenge studies. It includes eight Key Criteria related to scientific justification, risk-benefit assessment, consultation and engagement, co-ordination of research, site selection, participant selection, expert review, and informed consent. The document aims to provide comprehensive guidance to scientists, research ethics committees, funders, policymakers, and regulators in deliberations regarding SARS-CoV-2 challenge studies by outlining key criteria that would need to be satisfied in order for such studies to be ethically acceptable.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absolute risk and additional risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- absolute risk and local setting: 1
- absolute risk and long term follow: 1, 2
- accelerate vaccine development and local community: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date