Author: Park, Hayne Cho; Kim, Do Hyoung; Cho, Ajin; Kim, Juhee; Yun, Kyu-sang; Kim, Jinseog; Lee, Young-Ki
Title: Clinical outcomes of initially asymptomatic patients with COVID-19: a Korean nationwide cohort study Cord-id: j8bmsp73 Document date: 2021_2_13
ID: j8bmsp73
Snippet: BACKGROUND: This study was performed to compare severe clinical outcome between initially asymptomatic and symptomatic infections and to identify risk factors associated with high patient mortality among initially asymptomatic patients. METHODS: In this retrospective, nationwide cohort study, we included 5621 patients who had been discharged from isolation or died from COVID-19 by 30 April 2020. The mortality rate and admission rate to intensive care unit (ICU) were compared between initially as
Document: BACKGROUND: This study was performed to compare severe clinical outcome between initially asymptomatic and symptomatic infections and to identify risk factors associated with high patient mortality among initially asymptomatic patients. METHODS: In this retrospective, nationwide cohort study, we included 5621 patients who had been discharged from isolation or died from COVID-19 by 30 April 2020. The mortality rate and admission rate to intensive care unit (ICU) were compared between initially asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. We established a prediction model for patient mortality through risk factor analysis among initially asymptomatic patients. RESULTS: The prevalence of initially asymptomatic patients upon admission was 25.8%. The mortality rates were not different between groups (3.3% vs. 4.5%, p = .17). However, initially symptomatic patients were more likely to receive ICU care compared to initially asymptomatic patients (4.1% vs. 1.0%, p < .0001). The age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index score (CCIS) was the most potent predictor for patient mortality in initially asymptomatic patients. CONCLUSIONS: KEY MESSAGES: The mortality rate was not different between initially asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Symptomatic patients were more likely to admitted to the intensive care unit. Age and comorbidities were the potent risk factors for mortality.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absolute platelet lymphocyte count and logistic regression model: 1
- absolute platelet lymphocyte count and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
- admission mortality and liver disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- admission mortality and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- admission mortality and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- admission mortality and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- admission mortality and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- admission rate and liver disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- admission rate and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- admission rate and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- admission rate and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3
- admission rate and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- admission status and liver disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- admission status and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- admission status and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- admission status and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- liver disease and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
- liver disease and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- liver disease and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date