Selected article for: "aspartate aminotransferase and creatine kinase"

Author: Thell, Rainer; Zimmermann, Jascha; Szell, Marton; Tomez, Sabine; Eisenburger, Philip; Haugk, Moritz; Kreil, Anna; Spiel, Alexander; Blaschke, Amelie; Klicpera, Anna; Janata, Oskar; Krugluger, Walter; Sebesta, Christian; Herkner, Harald; Laky, Brenda
Title: Standard blood laboratory values as a clinical support tool to distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients
  • Cord-id: jpmj20wr
  • Document date: 2021_4_30
  • ID: jpmj20wr
    Snippet: Standard blood laboratory parameters may have diagnostic potential, if polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) tests are not available on time. We evaluated standard blood laboratory parameters of 655 COVID-19 patients suspected to be infected with SARS-CoV-2, who underwent PCR testing in one of five hospitals in Vienna, Austria. We compared laboratory parameters, clinical characteristics, and outcomes between positive and negative PCR-tested patients and evaluated the ability of those parameters to dis
    Document: Standard blood laboratory parameters may have diagnostic potential, if polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) tests are not available on time. We evaluated standard blood laboratory parameters of 655 COVID-19 patients suspected to be infected with SARS-CoV-2, who underwent PCR testing in one of five hospitals in Vienna, Austria. We compared laboratory parameters, clinical characteristics, and outcomes between positive and negative PCR-tested patients and evaluated the ability of those parameters to distinguish between groups. Of the 590 patients (20–100 years, 276 females and 314 males), 208 were PCR-positive. Positive compared to negative PCR-tested patients had significantly lower levels of leukocytes, neutrophils, basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocytes, and thrombocytes; while significantly higher levels were detected with erythrocytes, hemoglobin, hematocrit, C-reactive-protein, ferritin, activated-partial-thromboplastin-time, alanine-aminotransferase, aspartate-aminotransferase, lipase, creatine-kinase, and lactate-dehydrogenase. From all blood parameters, eosinophils, ferritin, leukocytes, and erythrocytes showed the highest ability to distinguish between COVID-19 positive and negative patients (area-under-curve, AUC: 72.3–79.4%). The AUC of our model was 0.915 (95% confidence intervals, 0.876–0.955). Leukopenia, eosinopenia, elevated erythrocytes, and hemoglobin were among the strongest markers regarding accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratio, and post-test probabilities. Our findings suggest that especially leukopenia, eosinopenia, and elevated hemoglobin are helpful to distinguish between COVID-19 positive and negative tested patients.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acute cardiac failure and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute cardiac failure and lymphocyte count: 1, 2
    • acute cardiac failure and lymphocyte neutrophil: 1
    • additional cohort and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
    • additional effort and logistic regression: 1
    • liver function and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • liver function and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • liver function and logistic regression analysis univariate: 1
    • liver function and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • liver function and lung disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • liver function and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • liver function and lymphocyte neutrophil: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
    • logistic regression analysis and lymphocyte neutrophil: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • logistic regression and lowered lymphocyte count: 1
    • logistic regression and lr negative likelihood ratio: 1
    • logistic regression and lr positive likelihood ratio: 1, 2, 3
    • logistic regression and lung disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • logistic regression and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • logistic regression and lymphocyte neutrophil: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25