Selected article for: "classification tool majority vote and majority vote"

Author: Lara Urban; Andre Holzer; J Jotautas Baronas; Michael Hall; Philipp Braeuninger-Weimer; Michael J Scherm; Daniel J Kunz; Surangi N Perera; Daniel E Martin-Herranz; Edward T Tipper; Susannah J Salter; Maximilian R Stammnitz
Title: Freshwater monitoring by nanopore sequencing
  • Document date: 2020_2_7
  • ID: 77nsidzc_57
    Snippet: For the aquatic sample, the number of unclassified reads were counted prior to monitoring the performance of each classification tool in comparison with a consensus classification, which we defined as majority vote across classifications from all computational workflows. We observed stable results across all three draws of 10,000 reads from the same dataset (data not shown), indicating a robust representation of the performance of each classifier.....
    Document: For the aquatic sample, the number of unclassified reads were counted prior to monitoring the performance of each classification tool in comparison with a consensus classification, which we defined as majority vote across classifications from all computational workflows. We observed stable results across all three draws of 10,000 reads from the same dataset (data not shown), indicating a robust representation of the performance of each classifier.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • classifier performance and majority vote: 1