Author: Lotfallah, Andrew; Aamery, Amaar; Moussa, George; Manu, Mangta
Title: Surgical Versus Conservative Management of Acute Appendicitis During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study Cord-id: kf8voyts Document date: 2021_3_24
ID: kf8voyts
Snippet: Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic provoked a change to normal surgical practice in the United Kingdom and led to an increase in acute appendicitis (AA) patients being treated conservatively with antibiotics. We aim to analyse the management of patients presenting with AA to our institution during the first wave of the pandemic, comparing surgically and conservatively managed patients. Method All patients presenting to our centre with AA between March and July 2020 were included. Six-month follo
Document: Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic provoked a change to normal surgical practice in the United Kingdom and led to an increase in acute appendicitis (AA) patients being treated conservatively with antibiotics. We aim to analyse the management of patients presenting with AA to our institution during the first wave of the pandemic, comparing surgically and conservatively managed patients. Method All patients presenting to our centre with AA between March and July 2020 were included. Six-month follow-up data were collected retrospectively using electronic records. Patients were categorised into surgically and conservatively managed groups. The primary outcome was the complication rate (post-operative complications vs failure of antibiotic treatment) and the secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay and Alvarado score. Results Fifty-seven patients (n=57) were admitted with AA, 45.6% (n=26) managed conservatively compared to 54.4% (n=31) treated surgically. Higher complication rates were observed amongst the conservatively managed group, although not found to be statistically significant (16% vs 35%; p=0.131). There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay observed between the two groups (surgical: median, 2; interquartile range, 2-3 vs conservative: median, 3; interquartile range, 2-4). White cell count (WCC) and Alvarado score were higher on admission in the surgical group with statistical significance (p=0.012 and p=0.028, respectively). Conclusions COVID-19 has led to a significant cohort of conservatively managed AA patients in the United Kingdom. We propose a stratification pathway based on clinical severity, Alvarado score and imaging to facilitate safe selection for conservative management of AA, in order to reduce failure of treatment rates in this patient group. Further UK-based studies will add to the evidence-based surrounding safe management of AA with conservative treatment.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- aa acute appendicitis and aa conservative surgical management: 1, 2
- aa acute appendicitis and aa diagnosis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- aa acute appendicitis and aa management: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
- aa acute appendicitis and aa severity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- aa acute appendicitis and aa surgical conservative management: 1, 2
- aa assessment and aa present: 1
- aa conservative management and aa diagnosis: 1, 2
- aa conservative management and aa management: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- aa conservative management and aa surgical conservative management: 1, 2
- aa conservative surgical management and aa diagnosis: 1, 2
- aa conservative surgical management and aa management: 1, 2
- aa diagnosis and aa management: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- aa management and aa severity: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date