Author: Lars S Jermiin; Renee A Catullo; Barbara R Holland
Title: A new phylogenetic protocol: Dealing with model misspecification and confirmation bias in molecular phylogenetics Document date: 2018_8_27
ID: hr6wfx4g_16
Snippet: Notwithstanding the likely benefits offered by the new phylogenetic protocol and the methods supporting it, it would be unwise to assume that further development of phylogenetic methods will no longer be needed. On the contrary, there is a lot of evidence that method development will be needed in different areas: • Analysis of Residuals -Although goodness-of-fit tests can tell you whether or not the lack of fit observed is potentially due to ch.....
Document: Notwithstanding the likely benefits offered by the new phylogenetic protocol and the methods supporting it, it would be unwise to assume that further development of phylogenetic methods will no longer be needed. On the contrary, there is a lot of evidence that method development will be needed in different areas: • Analysis of Residuals -Although goodness-of-fit tests can tell you whether or not the lack of fit observed is potentially due to chance, they do not answer the more useful question of whether or not that lack of fit matters or how the lack of fit arises (180,181). For this reason, residual diagnostic tools that can inform the user about the way in which their model fails to fit the data would be very useful.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- diagnostic tool and fit goodness: 1
- diagnostic tool and fit goodness test: 1
- diagnostic tool and likely benefit: 1
- diagnostic tool and method development: 1, 2, 3
- different area and likely benefit: 1
- fit goodness and method development: 1
- fit goodness and new phylogenetic protocol: 1
- likely benefit and longer need: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date