Selected article for: "different time and hospital patient number"

Author: Vanni, Simone; Bartalucci, Paola; Gargano, Ubaldo; Coppa, Alessandro; Giannasi, Gianfranco; Nazerian, Peiman; Tonietti, Barbara; Vannini, Roberto; Lanigra, Michele; Daviddi, Fabio; Baldini, Alessio; Grifoni, Stefano; Magazzini, Simone
Title: The presentations/physician ratio predicts door-to-physician time but not global length of stay in the emergency department: an Italian multicenter study during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
  • Cord-id: q3yjflq9
  • Document date: 2021_7_22
  • ID: q3yjflq9
    Snippet: To investigate the effects of the dramatic reduction in presentations to Italian Emergency Departments (EDs) on the main indicators of ED performance during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. From February to June 2020 we retrospectively measured the number of daily presentations normalized for the number of emergency physicians on duty (presentations/physician ratio), door-to-physician and door-to-final disposition (length-of-stay) times of seven EDs in the central area of Tuscany. Using the multivariate
    Document: To investigate the effects of the dramatic reduction in presentations to Italian Emergency Departments (EDs) on the main indicators of ED performance during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. From February to June 2020 we retrospectively measured the number of daily presentations normalized for the number of emergency physicians on duty (presentations/physician ratio), door-to-physician and door-to-final disposition (length-of-stay) times of seven EDs in the central area of Tuscany. Using the multivariate regression analysis we investigated the relationship between the aforesaid variables and patient-level (triage codes, age, admissions) or hospital-level factors (number of physician on duty, working surface area, academic vs. community hospital). We analyzed data from 105,271 patients. Over ten consecutive 14-day periods, the number of presentations dropped from 18,239 to 6132 (− 67%) and the proportion of patients visited in less than 60 min rose from 56 to 86%. The proportion of patients with a length-of-stay under 4 h decreased from 59 to 52%. The presentations/physician ratio was inversely related to the proportion of patients with a door-to-physician time under 60 min (slope − 2.91, 95% CI − 4.23 to − 1.59, R(2) = 0.39). The proportion of patients with high-priority codes but not the presentations/physician ratio, was inversely related to the proportion of patients with a length-of-stay under 4 h (slope − 0.40, 95% CI − 0.24 to − 0.27, R(2) = 0.36). The variability of door-to-physician time and global length-of-stay are predicted by different factors. For appropriate benchmarking among EDs, the use of performance indicators should consider specific, hospital-level and patient-level factors.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • absolute number and acute care: 1, 2, 3
    • absolute number and admission rate: 1, 2
    • academic hospital and acute care: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
    • academic hospital and admission rate: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • academic hospital and admit patient: 1
    • academic hospital and long patient: 1, 2
    • academic hospital community and acute care: 1, 2
    • acute care and admission rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
    • acute care and admit patient: 1
    • acute care and long patient: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute care and low pressure: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute care and low priority: 1, 2
    • acute care and low priority code: 1
    • admission rate and long patient: 1, 2
    • admission rate and low patient proportion: 1
    • admission rate and low pressure: 1, 2, 3
    • long patient and low pressure: 1