Selected article for: "high risk and risk population"

Author: Amir Shlomai; Ari Leshno; Ella H Sklan; Moshe Leshno
Title: Global versus focused isolation during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic-A cost-effectiveness analysis
  • Document date: 2020_4_1
  • ID: 1mpp7sbt_31
    Snippet: The assumptions used for the two strategies are described in Table 2 . In strategy 1, r1_HR_c represents the proportion of the population under relaxed isolation due to a high risk of contact with SARS-CoV-2 patients (0.7%). Under strategy 1, we estimated the proportion of the susceptible population under quarantine (r_S) to be 50%, while the proportion of carrier (r1_E) population that is under relaxed isolation was estimated at 80%. In contrast.....
    Document: The assumptions used for the two strategies are described in Table 2 . In strategy 1, r1_HR_c represents the proportion of the population under relaxed isolation due to a high risk of contact with SARS-CoV-2 patients (0.7%). Under strategy 1, we estimated the proportion of the susceptible population under quarantine (r_S) to be 50%, while the proportion of carrier (r1_E) population that is under relaxed isolation was estimated at 80%. In contrast, under strategy 2 (r2_HR_c) the proportion of the population under relaxed isolation will be lower (0.3%) due to repeated testing. Under strategy 2, the number of susceptible individuals under quarantine (r2_S) will be 0, while the proportion of carriers (r1_E) that are under relaxed isolation will remain 80%.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents