Author: Caballero, Daniel; Pérez-Palacios, Trinidad; Caro, Andrés; Ãvila, Mar; Antequera, Teresa
Title: Optimization of the image acquisition procedure in low-field MRI for non-destructive analysis of loin using predictive models Cord-id: un91nxbd Document date: 2021_6_7
ID: un91nxbd
Snippet: The use of low-field magnetic resonance imaging (LF-MRI) scanners has increased in recent years. The low economic cost in comparison to high-field (HF-MRI) scanners and the ease of maintenance make this type of scanner the best choice for nonmedical purposes. However, LF-MRI scanners produce low-quality images, which encourages the identification of optimization procedures to generate the best possible images. In this paper, optimization of the image acquisition procedure for an LF-MRI scanner i
Document: The use of low-field magnetic resonance imaging (LF-MRI) scanners has increased in recent years. The low economic cost in comparison to high-field (HF-MRI) scanners and the ease of maintenance make this type of scanner the best choice for nonmedical purposes. However, LF-MRI scanners produce low-quality images, which encourages the identification of optimization procedures to generate the best possible images. In this paper, optimization of the image acquisition procedure for an LF-MRI scanner is presented, and predictive models are developed. The MRI acquisition procedure was optimized to determine the physicochemical characteristics of pork loin in a nondestructive way using MRI, feature extraction algorithms and data processing methods. The most critical parameters (relaxation times, repetition time, and echo time) of the LF-MRI scanner were optimized, presenting a procedure that could be easily reproduced in other environments or for other purposes. In addition, two feature extraction algorithms (gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) and one point fractal texture algorithm (OPFTA)) were evaluated. The optimization procedure was validated by using several evaluation metrics, achieving reliable and accurate results (r > 0.85; weighted absolute percentage error (WAPE) lower than 0.1%; root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) lower than 0.1%; true standard deviation (TSTD) lower than 2; and mean absolute error (MAE) lower than 2). These results support the high degree of feasibility and accuracy of the optimized procedure of LF-MRI acquisition. No other papers present a procedure to optimize the image acquisition process in LF-MRI. Eventually, the optimization procedure could be applied to other LF-MRI systems.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absolute error and machine learn: 1
- absolute error and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58
- absolute error and machine learning model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- absolute error and mae absolute error: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73
- absolute error and magnetic field: 1
- absolute error and magnetic resonance: 1, 2, 3
- absolute percentage error and low quality: 1
- absolute percentage error and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
- absolute percentage error and machine learning model: 1, 2, 3
- absolute percentage error and mae absolute error: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26
- accurate feasible and machine learning: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date