Selected article for: "absolute error and root mean"

Author: Caballero, Daniel; Pérez-Palacios, Trinidad; Caro, Andrés; Ávila, Mar; Antequera, Teresa
Title: Optimization of the image acquisition procedure in low-field MRI for non-destructive analysis of loin using predictive models
  • Cord-id: un91nxbd
  • Document date: 2021_6_7
  • ID: un91nxbd
    Snippet: The use of low-field magnetic resonance imaging (LF-MRI) scanners has increased in recent years. The low economic cost in comparison to high-field (HF-MRI) scanners and the ease of maintenance make this type of scanner the best choice for nonmedical purposes. However, LF-MRI scanners produce low-quality images, which encourages the identification of optimization procedures to generate the best possible images. In this paper, optimization of the image acquisition procedure for an LF-MRI scanner i
    Document: The use of low-field magnetic resonance imaging (LF-MRI) scanners has increased in recent years. The low economic cost in comparison to high-field (HF-MRI) scanners and the ease of maintenance make this type of scanner the best choice for nonmedical purposes. However, LF-MRI scanners produce low-quality images, which encourages the identification of optimization procedures to generate the best possible images. In this paper, optimization of the image acquisition procedure for an LF-MRI scanner is presented, and predictive models are developed. The MRI acquisition procedure was optimized to determine the physicochemical characteristics of pork loin in a nondestructive way using MRI, feature extraction algorithms and data processing methods. The most critical parameters (relaxation times, repetition time, and echo time) of the LF-MRI scanner were optimized, presenting a procedure that could be easily reproduced in other environments or for other purposes. In addition, two feature extraction algorithms (gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) and one point fractal texture algorithm (OPFTA)) were evaluated. The optimization procedure was validated by using several evaluation metrics, achieving reliable and accurate results (r > 0.85; weighted absolute percentage error (WAPE) lower than 0.1%; root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) lower than 0.1%; true standard deviation (TSTD) lower than 2; and mean absolute error (MAE) lower than 2). These results support the high degree of feasibility and accuracy of the optimized procedure of LF-MRI acquisition. No other papers present a procedure to optimize the image acquisition process in LF-MRI. Eventually, the optimization procedure could be applied to other LF-MRI systems.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • low field magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance: 1
    • low noise signal ratio and machine learning: 1, 2
    • low noise signal ratio and machine learning model: 1
    • low noise signal ratio and magnetic resonance: 1
    • low number and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • low number and machine learning model: 1
    • low number and magnetic field: 1
    • low number and magnetic resonance: 1, 2, 3
    • low quality and machine learn: 1
    • low quality and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • low quality and machine learning model: 1
    • low quality and mae absolute error: 1
    • low quality and magnetic resonance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • machine learning and mae absolute error: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
    • machine learning and magnetic field: 1, 2, 3
    • machine learning and magnetic resonance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34
    • machine learning model and mae absolute error: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • machine learning model and magnetic resonance: 1, 2
    • mae absolute error and magnetic resonance: 1, 2