Selected article for: "Ab titer and antibody response"

Author: Zhao, Juanjuan; Yuan, Quan; Wang, Haiyan; Liu, Wei; Liao, Xuejiao; Su, Yingying; Wang, Xin; Yuan, Jing; Li, Tingdong; Li, Jinxiu; Qian, Shen; Hong, Congming; Wang, Fuxiang; Liu, Yingxia; Wang, Zhaoqin; He, Qing; Li, Zhiyong; He, Bin; Zhang, Tianying; Ge, Shengxiang; Liu, Lei; Zhang, Jun; Xia, Ningshao; Zhang, Zheng
Title: Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients of novel coronavirus disease 2019
  • Cord-id: llqpfhwg
  • Document date: 2020_3_3
  • ID: llqpfhwg
    Snippet: Summary Background The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is a newly emerging virus. The antibody response in infected patient remains largely unknown, and the clinical values of antibody testing have not been fully demonstrated. Methods A total of 173 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled. Their serial plasma samples (n = 535) collected during the hospitalization period were tested for total antibodies (Ab), IgM and IgG against SARS-CoV-2 using immunoassays. The dynamics of antib
    Document: Summary Background The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is a newly emerging virus. The antibody response in infected patient remains largely unknown, and the clinical values of antibody testing have not been fully demonstrated. Methods A total of 173 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled. Their serial plasma samples (n = 535) collected during the hospitalization period were tested for total antibodies (Ab), IgM and IgG against SARS-CoV-2 using immunoassays. The dynamics of antibodies with the progress and severity of disease was analyzed. Findings Among 173 patients, the seroconversion rate for Ab, IgM and IgG was 93.1% (161/173), 82.7% (143/173) and 64.7% (112/173), respectively. Twelve patients who had not seroconverted were those only blood samples at the early stage of illness were collected. The seroconversion sequentially appeared for Ab, IgM and then IgG, with a median time of 11, 12 and 14 days, respectively. The presence of antibodies was < 40% among patients in the first 7 days of illness, and then rapidly increased to 100.0%, 94.3% and 79.8% for Ab, IgM and IgG respectively since day 15 after onset. In contrast, the positive rate of RNA decreased from 66.7% (58/87) in samples collected before day 7 to 45.5% (25/55) during days 15 to 39. Combining RNA and antibody detections significantly improved the sensitivity of pathogenic diagnosis for COVID-19 patients (p < 0.001), even in early phase of 1-week since onset (p = 0.007). Moreover, a higher titer of Ab was independently associated with a worse clinical classification (p = 0.006). Interpretation The antibody detection offers vital clinical information during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The findings provide strong empirical support for the routine application of serological testing in the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 patients.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • ab sensitivity and acute infection: 1, 2, 3
    • ab sensitivity and acute infection diagnosis: 1
    • ab sensitivity and acute sars infection: 1, 2, 3
    • ab sensitivity and acute sars infection serological diagnosis: 1
    • ab seroconversion and ab test superior performance: 1
    • ab seroconversion and ab test superior performance contribute: 1
    • ab seroconversion and ab testing: 1
    • ab seroconversion and ab testing seronegative: 1
    • ab seroconversion and ab total antibody: 1, 2, 3
    • ab seroconversion and acute infection: 1, 2, 3
    • ab seroconversion and acute sars infection: 1, 2
    • ab testing and acute infection: 1
    • ab total antibody and acute infection: 1, 2
    • ab total antibody and acute sars infection: 1, 2
    • accurate timely and acute infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • accurate timely and acute infection diagnosis: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • accurate timely and acute sars infection: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • accurate timely diagnosis and acute infection diagnosis: 1, 2, 3
    • accurate timely diagnosis and acute sars infection: 1, 2, 3, 4