Selected article for: "cost effectiveness ratio and ICER cost effectiveness ratio"

Author: Vlachaki, Ioanna; Zinzi, Daniela; Falla, Edel; Mantopoulos, Theo; Guy, Holly; Jandu, Jasimran; Dodgson, Andrew
Title: Cost-effectiveness analysis of vaborem for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae-Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (CRE-KPC) infections in the UK
  • Cord-id: uy9wua4v
  • Document date: 2021_9_21
  • ID: uy9wua4v
    Snippet: OBJECTIVE: The study objective of this analysis was to determine the cost-effectiveness of vaborem (meropenem-vaborbactam) compared to the best available therapy (BAT) in adult patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae—Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (CRE-KPC) infections from the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS) and Personal Social Services (PSS). METHODS: A decision tree model was developed to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis for Vaborem compared to BAT
    Document: OBJECTIVE: The study objective of this analysis was to determine the cost-effectiveness of vaborem (meropenem-vaborbactam) compared to the best available therapy (BAT) in adult patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae—Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (CRE-KPC) infections from the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS) and Personal Social Services (PSS). METHODS: A decision tree model was developed to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis for Vaborem compared to BAT in CRE-KPC patients over a 5 year time horizon. The model structure for Vaborem simulated the clinical pathway of patients with a confirmed CRE-KPC infection. Model inputs for clinical effectiveness were sourced from the TANGO II trial, and published literature. Costs, resource use and utility values associated with CRE-KPC infections in the UK were sourced from the British National Formulary, NHS reference costs and published sources. RESULTS: Over a 5 year time horizon, Vaborem use increased total costs by £5165 and increased quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by 0.366, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £14,113 per QALY gained. The ICER was most sensitive to the probability of discharge to long-term care (LTC), the annual cost of LTC and the utility of discharge to home. At thresholds of £20,000/QALY and £30,000/QALY, the probability of Vaborem being cost-effective compared to BAT was 79.85% and 94.93%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Due to a limited cost impact and increase in patient quality of life, vaborem can be considered as a cost-effective treatment option compared to BAT for adult patients with CRE-KPC infections in the UK. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10198-021-01375-0.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acceptability curve and long short: 1
    • acquisition cost and administration cost: 1, 2
    • acquisition cost and administration dosing: 1, 2
    • acquisition cost and long duration: 1, 2
    • acquisition cost and long short: 1
    • acute event and long short: 1, 2, 3
    • acute pyelonephritis and long short: 1
    • adjustment dose and administration dosing: 1, 2, 3
    • administration dosing and long short: 1