Author: Yang, Jie; D’souza, Rohan; Kharrat, Ashraf; Fell, Deshayne B.; Snelgrove, John W.; Murphy, Kellie E.; Shah, Prakesh S.
Title: COVIDâ€19 pandemic and populationâ€level pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a living systematic review and metaâ€analysis Cord-id: lw3oypbu Document date: 2021_6_6
ID: lw3oypbu
Snippet: INTRODUCTION: Conflicting reports of increases and decreases in rates of preterm birth (PTB) and stillbirth in the general population during the COVIDâ€19 pandemic have surfaced. The objective of our study was to conduct a living systematic review and metaâ€analyses of studies reporting pregnancy and neonatal outcomes by comparing the pandemic and preâ€pandemic periods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase databases, reference lists of articles published up until May 14, 2021 a
Document: INTRODUCTION: Conflicting reports of increases and decreases in rates of preterm birth (PTB) and stillbirth in the general population during the COVIDâ€19 pandemic have surfaced. The objective of our study was to conduct a living systematic review and metaâ€analyses of studies reporting pregnancy and neonatal outcomes by comparing the pandemic and preâ€pandemic periods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase databases, reference lists of articles published up until May 14, 2021 and included English language studies that compared outcomes between the COVIDâ€19 pandemic time period vs. preâ€pandemic time periods. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastleâ€Ottawa scale. We conducted randomâ€effects metaâ€analysis using the inverse variance method. RESULTS: Thirtyâ€seven studies with lowâ€toâ€moderate risk of bias, reporting on 1,677,858 pregnancies during the pandemic period and 21,028,650 pregnancies during the preâ€pandemic period, were included. There was significant reduction in unadjusted estimates of PTB (28 studies, unadjusted odds ratio [uaOR] 0.94, 95% CI 0.91â€0.98) but not in adjusted estimates (6 studies, adjusted OR [aOR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.80â€1.13). The reduction was noted in studies from single centers/health areas (uaOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86â€0.94) but not in regional/national studies (uaOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95â€1.03). There was reduction in spontaneous PTB (5 studies, uaOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82â€0.98) and induced PTB (4 studies, uaOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81â€1.00). There was no reduction in PTB when stratified by GA <34, <32 or <28 weeks. There was no difference in stillbirths between the pandemic and preâ€pandemic time periods (21 studies, uaOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.94â€1.23 and 4 studies, aOR 1.06, 95% CI 0.81â€1.38). There was an increase in birth weight (6 studies, mean difference 17g, 95% CI 7â€28g) during the pandemic period. There was an increase in maternal mortality (4 studies, uaOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.05â€1.26), which was mostly influenced by one study from Mexico. There was significant publication bias for the outcome of PTB. CONCLUSIONS: The COVIDâ€19 pandemic time period may be associated with a reduction in PTB; however, referral bias cannot be excluded. There was no difference in stillbirth between pandemic and preâ€pandemic period.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date