Author: Tutuncu, Emin Ediz; Ozgur, Didem; Karamese, Murat
Title: Saliva samples for detection of SARSâ€CoVâ€2 in mildly symptomatic and asymptomatic patients Cord-id: lyo53peo Document date: 2021_2_9
ID: lyo53peo
Snippet: BACKGROUND: The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (Covidâ€19) pandemic has been rapidly spreading throughout the world with confirmed case numbers already exceeding 75 million. Although nasopharyngeal swabs are the most commonly utilized samples for based severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSâ€CoVâ€2) RNA detection, collecting these specimens requires healthcare workers and necessitates the use of personal protective equipment as it presents a nosocomial transmission risk. We a
Document: BACKGROUND: The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (Covidâ€19) pandemic has been rapidly spreading throughout the world with confirmed case numbers already exceeding 75 million. Although nasopharyngeal swabs are the most commonly utilized samples for based severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSâ€CoVâ€2) RNA detection, collecting these specimens requires healthcare workers and necessitates the use of personal protective equipment as it presents a nosocomial transmission risk. We aimed to assess the diagnostic value of saliva samples in mildly symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with confirmed Covidâ€19. METHODS: We performed a cohort study to validate the use of saliva for SARSâ€CoVâ€2 detection in mildly symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with a confirmed diagnosis of Covidâ€19. Saliva samples of the patients were analyzed by reverseâ€transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RTâ€PCR). RESULTS: In May 2020, 28 asymptomatic and 25 mildly symptomatic patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 37 years (range 4–70). None of the patients had a fever on presentation. Among 53 patients with SARSâ€CoVâ€2 detected in the nasopharyngeal sample, the realâ€time RTâ€PCR was positive in the saliva specimens in 48 (90.56%) patients. The mean cycle threshold (CT) values for nasopharyngeal and saliva specimens (27.80 ± 3.44 and 30.64 ± 2.83, respectively) were significantly correlated between the two sample types (p = .016). The mean CT values of nasopharyngeal and saliva samples in mildly symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (27.18 ± 3.53 and 30.24 ± 3.29 vs. 28.36 ± 3.31 and 30.98 ± 2.39, respectively) were not significantly different (p = .236 and p = .733, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Saliva specimens can be considered as a reliable and less resourceâ€intensive alternative to nasopharyngeal specimens for screening asymptomatic SARSâ€CoVâ€2 infections.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date