Author: Kang, Xixiong; Xu, Yang; Wu, Xiaoyi; Liang, Yong; Wang, Chen; Guo, Junhua; Wang, Yajie; Chen, Maohua; Wu, Da; Wang, Youchun; Bi, Shengli; Qiu, Yan; Lu, Peng; Cheng, Jing; Xiao, Bai; Hu, Liangping; Gao, Xing; Liu, Jingzhong; Wang, Yiping; Song, Yingzhao; Zhang, Liqun; Suo, Fengshuang; Chen, Tongyan; Huang, Zeyu; Zhao, Yunzhuan; Lu, Hong; Pan, Chunqin; Tang, Hong
Title: Proteomic Fingerprints for Potential Application to Early Diagnosis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Cord-id: sewfb3q8 Document date: 2005_1_1
ID: sewfb3q8
Snippet: Background: Definitive early-stage diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is important despite the number of laboratory tests that have been developed to complement clinical features and epidemiologic data in case definition. Pathologic changes in response to viral infection might be reflected in proteomic patterns in sera of SARS patients. Methods: We developed a mass spectrometric decision tree classification algorithm using surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-f
Document: Background: Definitive early-stage diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is important despite the number of laboratory tests that have been developed to complement clinical features and epidemiologic data in case definition. Pathologic changes in response to viral infection might be reflected in proteomic patterns in sera of SARS patients. Methods: We developed a mass spectrometric decision tree classification algorithm using surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Serum samples were grouped into acute SARS (n = 74; <7 days after onset of fever) and non-SARS [n = 1067; fever and influenza A (n = 203), pneumonia (n = 176); lung cancer (n = 29); and healthy controls (n = 659)] cohorts. Diluted samples were applied to WCX-2 ProteinChip arrays (Ciphergen), and the bound proteins were assessed on a ProteinChip Reader (Model PBS II). Bioinformatic calculations were performed with Biomarker Wizard software 3.1.1 (Ciphergen). Results: The discriminatory classifier with a panel of four biomarkers determined in the training set could precisely detect 36 of 37 (sensitivity, 97.3%) acute SARS and 987 of 993 (specificity, 99.4%) non-SARS samples. More importantly, this classifier accurately distinguished acute SARS from fever and influenza with 100% specificity (187 of 187). Conclusions: This method is suitable for preliminary assessment of SARS and could potentially serve as a useful tool for early diagnosis.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absence presence and acid application: 1, 2, 3
- absence presence and acute phase: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- absence presence and acute sars: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- absence presence and admission time: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- accordingly determine and acute sars: 1
- accuracy validity and acute sars: 1, 2
- acid application and acute sars: 1
- acute phase and admission time: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- acute sars and admission time: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute sars and local influenza: 1, 2, 3
- acute sars patient and admission time: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date