Author: Christensen, Rebecca A. G.; Arneja, Jasleen; St. Cyr, Kate; Sturrock, Shelby L.; Brooks, Jennifer D.
Title: The association of estimated cardiorespiratory fitness with COVID-19 incidence and mortality: A cohort study Cord-id: m3mwj373 Document date: 2021_5_5
ID: m3mwj373
Snippet: BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) may be used to identify those at greatest risk for severe COVID-19 illness. However, no study to date has examined the association between CRF and COVID-19. The objectives of this study were to determine whether CRF is independently associated with testing positive with or dying from COVID-19. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of 2,690 adults from the UK Biobank Study that were followed from March 16(th), 2020 to Ju
Document: BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) may be used to identify those at greatest risk for severe COVID-19 illness. However, no study to date has examined the association between CRF and COVID-19. The objectives of this study were to determine whether CRF is independently associated with testing positive with or dying from COVID-19. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of 2,690 adults from the UK Biobank Study that were followed from March 16(th), 2020 to July 26(th), 2020. Participants who were tested for COVID-19 and had undergone CRF assessment were examined. CRF was estimated (eCRF) and categorized as low (<20(th) percentile), moderate (20(th) to 80(th) percentile) and high (≥80(th) percentile) within sex and ten-year age groups (e.g. 50–60 years). Participants were classified as having COVID-19 if they tested positive (primarily PCR tests) at an in-patient or out-patient setting as of July 26, 2020. Participants were classified as having died from COVID-19 if the primary or underlying cause of death was listed ICD-10 codes U071 or U072 by June 30(th), 2020. Adjusted risk ratios (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated and a forward model building approach used to identify covariates. FINDINGS: There was no significant association between eCRF and testing positive for COVID-19. Conversely, individuals with moderate (aRR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.25, 0.75) and high fitness (aRR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.85) had a significantly lower risk of dying from COVID-19 than those with low fitness. CONCLUSIONS: While eCRF was not significantly associated with testing positive for COVID-19, we observed a significant dose-response between having higher eCRF and a decreased risk of dying from COVID-19. This suggests that prior gains in CRF could be protective against dying from COVID-19 should someone develop the virus.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- additional support and low moderate: 1, 2, 3
- additional support and lung function: 1
- administrative database and liver disease: 1
- administrative database and low moderate: 1
- administrative database and low moderate high: 1
- administrative database and lung function: 1
- liver disease and low cohort: 1, 2, 3
- liver disease and low moderate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- liver disease and low moderate high: 1
- liver disease and lung function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- low cohort and lung function: 1
- low moderate and lung function: 1, 2, 3, 4
- low moderate high and lung function: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date