Selected article for: "accuracy study and low number"

Author: Bosch, Floris Tm; Hendrikse, Jeroen; Davagnanam, Indran; Bonati, Leo H; van der Lugt, Aad; van der Worp, H B; de Borst, Gert J; Mali, Willem; Brown, Martin M; Nederkoorn, Paul J
Title: Optimal cut-off criteria for duplex ultrasound compared with computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of restenosis in stented carotid arteries in the international carotid stenting study.
  • Cord-id: vrbgbh9e
  • Document date: 2017_1_1
  • ID: vrbgbh9e
    Snippet: Introduction Previous studies that reported duplex-ultrasound cut-off criteria, based on blood velocity parameters, for the degree of stenosis in a stented carotid artery were either retrospective, or the reference test was carried out only when a patient was suspected of having restenosis at duplex ultrasound, which is likely to have resulted in verification bias. We performed a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy to find new blood velocity cut-offs in duplex ultrasound for in-stent resten
    Document: Introduction Previous studies that reported duplex-ultrasound cut-off criteria, based on blood velocity parameters, for the degree of stenosis in a stented carotid artery were either retrospective, or the reference test was carried out only when a patient was suspected of having restenosis at duplex ultrasound, which is likely to have resulted in verification bias. We performed a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy to find new blood velocity cut-offs in duplex ultrasound for in-stent restenosis. Patients and methods Stented patients within the international carotid stenting study were eligible. Patients had a carotid computed tomography angiography in addition to routine duplex ultrasound performed at a yearly follow-up. Duplex-ultrasound bloodflow velocity parameters were compared to the degree of stenosis on computed tomography angiography. The results were analysed using receiver-operating-characteristic curves. Results We included 103 patients in this study. On computed tomography angiography, 30 (29.1%) patients had a 30%-49% in-stent restenosis, 21 (20.4%) patients had 50%-69% in-stent restenosis and 5 (4.9%) patients a ≥70% in-stent restenosis. The cut-off value ≥50% stenosis was a peak systolic velocity of 125 cm/s (sensitivity: 63% (95% CI: 41-79), specificity: 83% (95% CI: 72-90)). Discussion This study provides a level 2b evidence for new cut-off values for in-stent restenosis. Unfortunately, we could not say anything about severe stenosis because of the low number of severe stenosis after one year. Conclusions The 125 cm/s cut-off value on duplex ultrasound is lower than found in previous studies and equal to unstented arteries. Duplex-ultrasound measurements made in stented carotid arteries should not be corrected for the presence of a stent when determining the degree of stenosis.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • Try single phrases listed below for: 1
    Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date