Selected article for: "CT result and negative result"

Author: Boeckmans, Joost; Cartuyvels, Reinoud; Hilkens, Petra; Bruckers, Liesbeth; Magerman, Koen; Waumans, Luc; Raymaekers, Marijke
Title: Follow-up testing of borderline SARS-CoV-2 patients by rRT-PCR allows early diagnosis of COVID-19
  • Cord-id: 9q4c7ip0
  • Document date: 2021_2_18
  • ID: 9q4c7ip0
    Snippet: Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in nasopharyngeal samples using the real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) is the gold standard for diagnosing COVID-19. Determination of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by rRT-PCR sometimes results in an inconclusive test result due to a high cycle threshold (CT)-value. We retrospectively analyzed 30851 SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR test results. Borderline positivity was considered as the presence of ≤ 25 viral copies per milliliter, while no amplification was co
    Document: Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in nasopharyngeal samples using the real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) is the gold standard for diagnosing COVID-19. Determination of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by rRT-PCR sometimes results in an inconclusive test result due to a high cycle threshold (CT)-value. We retrospectively analyzed 30851 SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR test results. Borderline positivity was considered as the presence of ≤ 25 viral copies per milliliter, while no amplification was considered as a negative test result. Of all test results, 204 were answered as borderline, of which 107 were accompanied by a follow-up test within 96h. Of the 107 follow-up samples, 10 (9.35%) were found positive for SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 symptoms were not predictive for testing positive in the follow-up test. The positive SARS-CoV-2 samples in the follow-up group represented 0.92% of all positive test results, highlighting the need for retesting and increased hygienic measures for borderline SARS-CoV-2 patients. [NCT04636294]

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • Try single phrases listed below for: 1