Selected article for: "abnormal behavior and logistic regression"
Author: Peng, Mao; Wang, Li; Xue, Qing; Yin, Lu; Zhu, Bo-heng; Wang, Kun; Shangguan, Fang-fang; Zhang, Pei-ran; Niu, Yan-yan; Zhang, Wen-rui; Zhao, Wen-feng; Wang, Huang; Lv, Jing; Song, Hai-qing; Min, Bao-quan; Leng, Hai-xia; Jia, Yu; Chang, Hong; Yu, Zhi-peng; Tian, Qing; Yang, Yuan; Zhu, Zhou; Li, Wei; Gao, Xiao-ling; Liu, Xiao-lei; Yang, Mei; Wang, Ping; Wei, Peng-hu; Wang, Chun-xue; Li, Jin-na; Jia, Long-bin; Huang, Xiao-min; Li, Dong-ning; Xu, Dong-juan; Deng, Yun-long; Si, Tian-mei; Dong, Hui-qing; Wang, Yu-ping; Cosci, Fiammetta; Wang, Hong-xing
Title: Post-COVID-19 Epidemic: Allostatic Load among Medical and Nonmedical Workers in China
  • Cord-id: mxqird97
  • Document date: 2020_11_5
    • ID: mxqird97
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: As the fight against the COVID-19 epidemic continues, medical workers may have allostatic load. OBJECTIVE: During the reopening of society, medical and nonmedical workers were compared in terms of allostatic load. METHODS: An online study was performed; 3,590 Chinese subjects were analyzed. Socio-demographic variables, allostatic load, stress, abnormal illness behavior, global well-being, mental status, and social support were assessed. RESULTS: There was no difference in allostatic
    Document: BACKGROUND: As the fight against the COVID-19 epidemic continues, medical workers may have allostatic load. OBJECTIVE: During the reopening of society, medical and nonmedical workers were compared in terms of allostatic load. METHODS: An online study was performed; 3,590 Chinese subjects were analyzed. Socio-demographic variables, allostatic load, stress, abnormal illness behavior, global well-being, mental status, and social support were assessed. RESULTS: There was no difference in allostatic load in medical workers compared to nonmedical workers (15.8 vs. 17.8%; p = 0.22). Multivariate conditional logistic regression revealed that anxiety (OR = 1.24; 95% CI 1.18–1.31; p < 0.01), depression (OR = 1.23; 95% CI 1.17–1.29; p < 0.01), somatization (OR = 1.20; 95% CI 1.14–1.25; p < 0.01), hostility (OR = 1.24; 95% CI 1.18–1.30; p < 0.01), and abnormal illness behavior (OR = 1.49; 95% CI 1.34–1.66; p < 0.01) were positively associated with allostatic load, while objective support (OR = 0.84; 95% CI 0.78–0.89; p < 0.01), subjective support (OR = 0.84; 95% CI 0.80–0.88; p < 0.01), utilization of support (OR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.72–0.88; p < 0.01), social support (OR = 0.90; 95% CI 0.87–0.93; p < 0.01), and global well-being (OR = 0.30; 95% CI 0.22–0.41; p < 0.01) were negatively associated. CONCLUSIONS: In the post-COVID-19 epidemic time, medical and nonmedical workers had similar allostatic load. Psychological distress and abnormal illness behavior were risk factors for it, while social support could relieve it.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abnormal illness behavior and logistic regression: 1
    • lockdown start and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • lockdown start and logistic regression analysis: 1
    • logistic regression analysis and long term exposure: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • logistic regression and long term exposure: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10