Selected article for: "assess psychological distress and psychological distress"

Author: Chen, Xu; Wu, Ruiheng; Xu, Jia; Wang, Jiawei; Gao, Mingcheng; Chen, Yunting; Pan, Yuanping; Ji, Haoqiang; Duan, Yuxin; Sun, Meng; Du, Liang; Zhou, Ling
Title: Prevalence and associated factors of psychological distress in tuberculosis patients in Northeast China: a cross-sectional study
  • Cord-id: bvblfk0i
  • Document date: 2021_6_12
  • ID: bvblfk0i
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: Psychological distress, a major comorbidities of tuberculosis (TB) patients, has posed a serious threat to the progress being made in global TB programs by affecting treatment adherence and health outcomes. However, the magnitude and associated factors of psychological distress have not been fully studied in China. The aim of the current study was to assess the prevalence of psychological distress in TB patients and to further determine the effects of socio-demographic characteristic
    Document: BACKGROUND: Psychological distress, a major comorbidities of tuberculosis (TB) patients, has posed a serious threat to the progress being made in global TB programs by affecting treatment adherence and health outcomes. However, the magnitude and associated factors of psychological distress have not been fully studied in China. The aim of the current study was to assess the prevalence of psychological distress in TB patients and to further determine the effects of socio-demographic characteristics, health-related variables, substance use status, social support, and experienced stigma on psychological distress. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among TB patients attending three medical institutions in Dalian, Liaoning Province, Northeast China from November 2020 to March 2021. A structured questionnaire was developed to collect data on patients’ socio-demographic characteristics, health-related information, substance use status, psychological distress, family function, doctor-patient relationship, policy support, experienced stigma and so on. The binary logistics regression model was used to determine the associated factors of psychological distress. RESULTS: A total of 473 TB patients were enrolled in this study, and the prevalence of psychological distress was 64.1%. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that patients with a middle school education level or above (OR: 0.521, 95%CI: 0.279–0.974), no adverse drug reactions (OR: 0.476, 95%CI: 0.268–0.846), and regular physical exercise (OR: 0.528, 95%CI: 0.281–0.993) were more likely to stay away from psychological distress. However, patients who had a high economic burden (OR: 1.697, 95%CI: 1.014–2.840), diabetes (OR: 2.165, 95%CI: 1.025–4.573), self-rated illness severe (OR: 3.169, 95%CI: 1.081–9.285), perceived poor resistance (OR: 2.065, 95%CI: 1.118–3.815), severe family dysfunction (OR: 4.001, 95%CI: 1.158–13.823), perceived need for strengthen psychological counseling (OR: 4.837, 95%CI: 2.833–8.258), and a high experienced stigma (OR: 3.253, 95%CI: 1.966–5.384) tended to have a psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS: The study found that the proportion of psychological distress among TB patients was high in Northeast China, and it was influenced by a variety of factors. Effective interventions to reduce psychological distress in TB patients urgently need to be developed, and greater attention should be given to patients with risk factors. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-06284-4.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abdominal discomfort and local patient: 1
    • abdominal discomfort and logistic regression: 1
    • actual feeling and logistic regression: 1
    • actual feeling and logistic regression analysis: 1
    • additional file and liver damage: 1, 2
    • additional file and location patient: 1
    • additional file and logistic regression: 1
    • additional file and logistic regression analysis: 1
    • adequate attention and logistic regression: 1
    • adequate attention and logistic regression analysis: 1
    • adherence treatment and liver damage: 1, 2
    • adherence treatment and local patient: 1, 2
    • adherence treatment and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
    • adherence treatment and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2
    • liver damage and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • liver damage and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2
    • local patient and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • local patient and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2
    • location patient and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8