Author: Khanna, Munish; Agarwal, Astitwa; Singh, Law Kumar; Thawkar, Shankar; Khanna, Ashish; Gupta, Deepak
Title: Radiologist-Level Two Novel and Robust Automated Computer-Aided Prediction Models for Early Detection of COVID-19 Infection from Chest X-ray Images Cord-id: z0rycyjr Document date: 2021_8_7
ID: z0rycyjr
Snippet: COVID-19 is an ongoing pandemic that is widely spreading daily and reaches a significant community spread. X-ray images, computed tomography (CT) images and test kits (RT-PCR) are three easily available options for predicting this infection. Compared to the screening of COVID-19 infection from X-ray and CT images, the test kits(RT-PCR) available to diagnose COVID-19 face problems such as high analytical time, high false negative outcomes, poor sensitivity and specificity. Radiological signatures
Document: COVID-19 is an ongoing pandemic that is widely spreading daily and reaches a significant community spread. X-ray images, computed tomography (CT) images and test kits (RT-PCR) are three easily available options for predicting this infection. Compared to the screening of COVID-19 infection from X-ray and CT images, the test kits(RT-PCR) available to diagnose COVID-19 face problems such as high analytical time, high false negative outcomes, poor sensitivity and specificity. Radiological signatures that X-rays can detect have been found in COVID-19 positive patients. Radiologists may examine these signatures, but it's a time-consuming and error-prone process (riddled with intra-observer variability). Thus, the chest X-ray analysis process needs to be automated, for which AI-driven tools have proven to be the best choice to increase accuracy and speed up analysis time, especially in the case of medical image analysis. We shortlisted four datasets and 20 CNN-based models to test and validate the best ones using 16 detailed experiments with fivefold cross-validation. The two proposed models, ensemble deep transfer learning CNN model and hybrid LSTMCNN, perform the best. The accuracy of ensemble CNN was up to 99.78% (96.51% average-wise), F1-score up to 0.9977 (0.9682 average-wise) and AUC up to 0.9978 (0.9583 average-wise). The accuracy of LSTMCNN was up to 98.66% (96.46% average-wise), F1-score up to 0.9974 (0.9668 average-wise) and AUC up to 0.9856 (0.9645 average-wise). These two best pre-trained transfer learning-based detection models can contribute clinically by offering the patients prediction correctly and rapidly.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- accuracy acceptable and achieve high: 1
- accuracy f1 and achieve high: 1, 2, 3, 4
- accuracy f1 score and achieve high: 1, 2, 3
- accuracy f1 score auc and achieve high: 1
- accuracy increase and achieve high: 1
- accuracy provide and achieve high: 1, 2, 3
- accuracy rate and achieve high: 1
- accuracy specificity and achieve high: 1, 2, 3, 4
- accurate diagnosis and achieve high: 1, 2, 3, 4
- accurate rapid and achieve high: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date