Author: Piro, Agostino; Magnocavallo, Michele; Della Rocca, Domenico Giovanni; Neccia, Matteo; Manzi, Giovanna; Mariani, Marco Valerio; Straito, Martina; Bernardini, Alessia; Severino, Paolo; Iannucci, Gino; Giunta, Giuseppe; Chimenti, Cristina; Natale, Andrea; Fedele, Francesco; Lavalle, Carlo
Title: Management of cardiac implantable electronic device followâ€up in COVIDâ€19 pandemic: Lessons learned during Italian lockdown Cord-id: kkkdd15n Document date: 2020_9_30
ID: kkkdd15n
Snippet: INTRODUCTION: Remote monitoring (RM) has significantly transformed the standard of care for patients with cardiac electronic implantable devices. It provides easy access to valuable information, such as arrhythmic events, acute decompensation manifestations and deviceâ€related issues, without the need of inâ€person visits. METHODS: Starting March 1st, 332 patients were introduced to an RM program during the Italian lockdown to limit the risk of inâ€hospital exposure to severe acute respirator
Document: INTRODUCTION: Remote monitoring (RM) has significantly transformed the standard of care for patients with cardiac electronic implantable devices. It provides easy access to valuable information, such as arrhythmic events, acute decompensation manifestations and deviceâ€related issues, without the need of inâ€person visits. METHODS: Starting March 1st, 332 patients were introduced to an RM program during the Italian lockdown to limit the risk of inâ€hospital exposure to severe acute respiratory syndromeâ€coronavirusâ€2. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the modality of RM delivery (home [n = 229] vs. office [n = 103] delivered). The study aimed at assessing the efficacy of the new followâ€up protocol, assessed as mean RM activation time (AT), and the need for technical support. In addition, patients' acceptance and anxiety status were quantified via the Home Monitoring Acceptance and Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7â€item scale. RESULTS: AT time was less than 48 h in 93% of patients and 7% of them required further technical support. Despite a higher number of transâ€telephonic technical support in the homeâ€delivered RM group, mean AT was similar between groups (1.33 ± 0.83 days in homeâ€delivered vs 1.28 ± 0.81 days in officeâ€delivered patients; p = .60). A total of 28 (2.5%) urgent/emergent inâ€person examinations were required. A high degree of patient satisfaction was reached in both groups whereas anxiety status was higher in the officeâ€delivered group. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of RM resulted in high patient satisfaction, regardless of the modality of modem delivery; nonetheless, inâ€office modem delivery was associated with a higher prevalence of anxiety symptoms.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- acute respiratory syndrome and additional benefit: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- acute respiratory syndrome and low risk patient: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date