Author: Katano, Takahito; Shimura, Takaya; Nishie, Hirotada; Iwai, Tomohiro; Itoh, Keisuke; Ebi, Masahide; Mizuno, Yusuke; Togawa, Shozo; Shibata, Shunsuke; Yamada, Tomonori; Mizushima, Takashi; Inagaki, Yusuke; Kitagawa, Mika; Nojiri, Yu; Tanaka, Yoshito; Okamoto, Yasuyuki; Sugiura, Miyuki; Matoya, Sho; Nagura, Yoshihito; Inagaki, Yuki; Koguchi, Hiroki; Ono, Satoshi; Ozeki, Keiji; Hayashi, Noriyuki; Takiguchi, Shuji; Kataoka, Hiromi
Title: The first management using intubation of a nasogastric tube with Gastrografin enterography or long tube for non-strangulated acute small bowel obstruction: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Cord-id: nodk0h6d Document date: 2020_7_15
ID: nodk0h6d
Snippet: BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal decompression is generally applied to a non-strangulated acute small bowel obstruction (NSASBO). Although long tube (LT) placement and administration of Gastrografin through a nasogastric tube (NGT-G) have shown advantages over NGT alone in previous studies, no studies appear to have compared LT and NGT-G. METHODS In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, patients with NSASBO were randomly assigned to receive LT or NGT-G between July 2016 and November 2018 at
Document: BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal decompression is generally applied to a non-strangulated acute small bowel obstruction (NSASBO). Although long tube (LT) placement and administration of Gastrografin through a nasogastric tube (NGT-G) have shown advantages over NGT alone in previous studies, no studies appear to have compared LT and NGT-G. METHODS In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, patients with NSASBO were randomly assigned to receive LT or NGT-G between July 2016 and November 2018 at 11 Japanese institutions. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of NGT-G compared to LT for non-surgery rate, and the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the non-surgery rate (-15%) was set as the lower margin for inferiority of NGT-G compared to LT. RESULTS In total, 223 patients (LT group, n = 111; NGT-G group, n = 112) were analyzed in the present trial. The non-surgery rate was 87.4% in the LT group and 91.1% in the NGT-G group, with a 3.7% difference between NGT-G and LT (95.3%CI - 5.55 to 12.91; non-inferiority P = 0.00002923). On the other hand, the non-surgery rate with pure NGT-G alone (76.8%) that represents non-cross-over NGT-G without subsequent LT was significantly lower than that with LT (P = 0.039). Median procedure time was significantly shorter with NGT-G (1 min) than with LT (25 min; P < 0.001), whereas no significant differences in mortality or hospital stay were noted between groups. CONCLUSION NGT-G is an effective alternative to LT as a first-line treatment for NSASBO. A sequential strategy comprising NGT-G followed by LT might offer a new standard for NSASBO. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION This trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (umin.ac.jp/ctr Identifier: UMIN000022669) prior to the start of this trial.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date