Author: Falaschi, Zeno; Danna, Pietro S.C.; Arioli, Roberto; Pasché, Alessio; Zagaria, Domenico; Percivale, Ilaria; Tricca, Stefano; Barini, Michela; Aquilini, Ferruccio; Andreoni, Stefano; Carriero, Alessandro
Title: Chest CT accuracy in diagnosing COVID-19 during the peak of the Italian epidemic: A retrospective correlation with RT-PCR testing and analysis of discordant cases Cord-id: o2ehsogh Document date: 2020_7_25
ID: o2ehsogh
Snippet: OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to assess chest computed tomography (CT) diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice using RT-PCR as standard of reference. METHODS: From March 4th to April 9th 2020, during the peak of the Italian COVID-19 epidemic, we enrolled a series of 773 patients that performed both non-contrast chest CT and RT-PCR with a time interval no longer than a week due to suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection. The diagnostic performance of CT was evaluated according to sensitivity, sp
Document: OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to assess chest computed tomography (CT) diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice using RT-PCR as standard of reference. METHODS: From March 4th to April 9th 2020, during the peak of the Italian COVID-19 epidemic, we enrolled a series of 773 patients that performed both non-contrast chest CT and RT-PCR with a time interval no longer than a week due to suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection. The diagnostic performance of CT was evaluated according to sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy, considering RT-PCR as the reference standard. An analysis on the patients with discrepant CT scan and RT-PCR result and on the patient with both negative tests was performed. RESULTS: RT-PCR testing showed an overall positive rate of 59.8 %. CT sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for SARS-CoV-2 infection were 90.7 % [95 % IC, 87.7%–93.2%], 78.8 % [95 % IC, 73.8−83.2%], 86.4 % [95 % IC, 76.1 %–88.9 %], 85.1 % [95 % IC, 81.0 %–88.4] and 85.9 % [95 % IC 83.2−88.3%], respectively. Twenty-five/66 (37.6 %) patients with positive CT and negative RT-PCR results and 12/245 (4.9 %) patients with both negative tests were nevertheless judged as positive cases by the clinicians based on clinical and epidemiological criteria and consequently treated. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, in a context of high pre-test probability, CT scan shows good sensitivity and a consistently higher specificity for the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia than what reported by previous studies, especially when clinical and epidemiological features are taken into account.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- accuracy npv and low incidence: 1
- accuracy npv and low sensitivity: 1, 2, 3
- accuracy npv ppv and low incidence: 1
- accuracy npv ppv and low sensitivity: 1, 2, 3
- accuracy npv ppv specificity and low incidence: 1
- accuracy npv ppv specificity and low sensitivity: 1, 2, 3
- accuracy npv ppv specificity ct sensitivity and low sensitivity: 1
- acquisition time and low sensitivity: 1, 2
- acquisition time and lung involvement: 1
- actual percentage and low percentage: 1, 2, 3, 4
- additional benefit and low incidence: 1
- additional benefit and low sensitivity: 1
- low incidence and lung involvement: 1
- low percentage and lung involvement: 1, 2
- low sensitivity and lung involvement: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- low sensitivity despite and lung involvement: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date