Selected article for: "alternative method and prospective randomized study"

Author: Choi, Nellie; Edginton, Heather D; Griffin, Craig E; Angus, John C
Title: Comparison of two ear cytological collection techniques in dogs with otitis externa.
  • Cord-id: c84l38nr
  • Document date: 2018_1_1
  • ID: c84l38nr
    Snippet: BACKGROUND Canine otitis externa is a common disease. Cytological evaluation of otic exudate is a useful diagnostic test to direct and monitor treatment for otitis externa. One method of collecting ear cytological specimens utilizes a cotton-tipped swab inserted into the vertical ear canal. A proposed alternative method is to aspirate exudate from the deep horizontal canal using a rubber tube. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES To compare cytological findings between two different collection techniques by ev
    Document: BACKGROUND Canine otitis externa is a common disease. Cytological evaluation of otic exudate is a useful diagnostic test to direct and monitor treatment for otitis externa. One method of collecting ear cytological specimens utilizes a cotton-tipped swab inserted into the vertical ear canal. A proposed alternative method is to aspirate exudate from the deep horizontal canal using a rubber tube. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES To compare cytological findings between two different collection techniques by evaluating the numbers of bacteria, Malassezia yeast and inflammatory cells. ANIMALS Thirty client-owned dogs with otitis externa. METHODS AND MATERIALS A prospective, randomized, blinded comparison study. Ear canals from each dog were sampled using cotton swab and rubber tube. Ear cytological preparations were evaluated independently by two investigators for polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMN), monocytes/lymphocytes, macrophages, yeast, intracellular (IC) cocci, extracellular (EC) cocci, IC bacilli and EC bacilli. RESULTS A paired Student's t-test was used to compare the two techniques. The inter-investigator reliability for PMN, EC bacilli and yeast was good, and for EC cocci was moderate. There were significantly higher numbers of PMNs obtained by the tube method (P = 0.0024) than by the cotton swab method. There were no statistically significant differences between cotton swab and rubber tube methods for monocytes/lymphocytes (P = 0.7780), macrophages (P = 0.1751), EC cocci (P = 0.1262), EC bacilli (P = 0.1162), yeast (P = 0.5371), IC cocci (P = 0.6606) or IC bacilli (P = 0.6761). The technique was well tolerated. CONCLUSION An alternative ear cytological collection technique was identified which enables sampling of the deep horizontal canal.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • Try single phrases listed below for: 1
    Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date