Selected article for: "confidence interval and LR positive likelihood ratio"

Author: Walsh, Paul; Hankins, Andrea; Bang, Heejung
Title: Point-of-care Lung Ultrasound Is Useful to Evaluate Emergency Department Patients for COVID-19
  • Cord-id: asjojdu2
  • Document date: 2020_9_28
  • ID: asjojdu2
    Snippet: INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can be a life-threatening lung disease or a trivial upper respiratory infection depending on whether the alveoli are involved. Emergency department (ED) evaluation of symptomatic patients with normal vital signs is frequently limited to chest auscultation and oro-nasopharyngeal swabs. We tested the null hypothesis that patients being screened for COVID-19 in the ED with normal vital signs and without hypoxia would have a point-of-care lung ultras
    Document: INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can be a life-threatening lung disease or a trivial upper respiratory infection depending on whether the alveoli are involved. Emergency department (ED) evaluation of symptomatic patients with normal vital signs is frequently limited to chest auscultation and oro-nasopharyngeal swabs. We tested the null hypothesis that patients being screened for COVID-19 in the ED with normal vital signs and without hypoxia would have a point-of-care lung ultrasound (LUS) consistent with COVID-19 less than 2% of the time. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, structured, blinded ultrasound review and chart review in patients 14 years or older with symptoms prompting ED evaluation for COVID-19. We excluded those with known congestive heart failure or other chronic lung conditions likely to cause excessive B-lines on LUS. We used a two-sided exact hypothesis test for binomial random variables. We measured LUS diagnostic performance using computed tomography as the gold standard. RESULTS: We reviewed 77 charts; 49 met inclusion criteria. Vital signs were normal in 30/49 patients; 10 (33%) of these patients had LUS consistent with viral pneumonitis. We rejected the null hypothesis (p-value <0.001). The treating physicians’ interpretations of their own point-of-care LUS had a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval (CI), 74%, 100%), specificity 88% (95% CI, 47%, 100%), likelihood ratio (LR) positive of 5.8 (95% CI, 1.3, 25), and LR negative of 0.05 (95% CI, 0.03, 0.71) when compared to CT findings. CONCLUSION: LUS had a meaningful detection rate for pneumonitis in symptomatic ED patients with normal vital signs who were being evaluated for COVID-19. We recommend at least LUS be used in addition to polymerase chain reaction testing when evaluating symptomatic ED patients for COVID-19.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • low respiratory and lung imaging: 1, 2, 3
    • low respiratory and lung involvement: 1, 2
    • low respiratory and lung ultrasound: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • low respiratory and lus imaging: 1, 2, 3
    • low respiratory and lus lung ultrasound: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • low respiratory tract and lung disease: 1, 2, 3
    • lung disease and lus consistent: 1
    • lung disease and lus diagnostic performance: 1, 2, 3
    • lung disease and lus imaging: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • lung disease and lus lung ultrasound: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35
    • lung disease and lus lung ultrasound evidence: 1, 2
    • lung disease and lus performance characteristic: 1
    • lung disease and lus protocol: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • lung disease and lus useful: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • lung disease and lus utility: 1, 2
    • lung involvement and lus diagnostic performance: 1, 2
    • lung involvement and lus imaging: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • lung involvement and lus lung ultrasound: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28
    • lung involvement and lus lung ultrasound evidence: 1