Author: Jiang, Yanfang; Wang, Haifeng; Hao, Sijia; Chen, Yukun; He, Jiaxue; Liu, Yong; Chen, Liguo; Yu, Yuanhua; Hua, Shucheng
Title: Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications Cord-id: cubp1cc1 Document date: 2020_11_4
ID: cubp1cc1
Snippet: The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed great challenges in people’s daily lives. Highly sensitive laboratory techniques played a critical role in clinical COVID-19 diagnosis and management. In this study the feasibility of using a new digital PCR-based detection assay for clinical COVID-19 diagnosis was investigated by comparing its performance with that of RT-PCR. Clinical patient samples and samples obtained from potentially contaminated environments were analyzed.
Document: The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed great challenges in people’s daily lives. Highly sensitive laboratory techniques played a critical role in clinical COVID-19 diagnosis and management. In this study the feasibility of using a new digital PCR-based detection assay for clinical COVID-19 diagnosis was investigated by comparing its performance with that of RT-PCR. Clinical patient samples and samples obtained from potentially contaminated environments were analyzed. The study included 10 patients with confirmed COVID-19 diagnoses, 32 validated samples of various types derived from different clinical timepoints and sites, and 148 environmentally derived samples. SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids were more readily detected in respiratory tract samples (35.0%). In analyses of environmentally derived samples, the positivity rate of air samples was higher than that of surface samples, probably due to differences in virus concentrations. Digital PCR detected SARS–CoV–2 in several samples that had previously been deemed negative, including 3 patient-derived samples and 5 environmentally derived samples. In this study digital PCR exhibited higher sensitivity than conventional RT-PCR, suggesting that it may be a useful new method for clinical SARS-CoV-2 detection. Improvement of SARS-CoV-2 detection would substantially reduce the rates of false-negative COVID-19 test results, in particular those pertaining to asymptomatic carriers.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absolute quantification and accurate rapid method: 1
- absolute quantification and acid detection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- absolute quantification and acid detection kit: 1
- absolute quantification and low detection: 1
- accession number and acid fragment: 1
- accession number and acid sequence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- accuracy high sensitivity and acid detection: 1, 2, 3
- accuracy high sensitivity and acid sequence: 1
- accuracy high sensitivity and low detection: 1, 2
- accurate rapid and acid detection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- accurate rapid and acid detection assay: 1, 2
- accurate rapid and acid detection kit: 1
- accurate rapid and acid fragment: 1
- accurate rapid and acid sequence: 1, 2, 3
- accurate rapid and additional sample: 1
- accurate rapid and additional testing: 1
- accurate rapid and low concentration: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- accurate rapid and low detection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- accurate rapid method and low detection: 1, 2, 3, 4
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date