Author: Wong, Alicia Y. W.; Johnsson, Alexander T. A.; Iversen, Aina; Athlin, Simon; Özenci, Volkan
                    Title: Evaluation of Four Lateral Flow Assays for the Detection of Legionella Urinary Antigen  Cord-id: lqcrhy4s  Document date: 2021_2_26
                    ID: lqcrhy4s
                    
                    Snippet: Urinary antigen tests (UATs) are often used to diagnose Legionnaires’ disease as they are rapid and easy to perform on readily obtainable urine samples without the need for specialized skills compared to conventional methods. Recently developed automated readers for UATs may provide objective results interpretation, especially in cases of weak result bands. Using 53 defined patient urine samples, we evaluated the performance of the BinaxNOW Legionella Antigen Card (Abbott), ImmuView S. pneumon
                    
                    
                    
                     
                    
                    
                    
                    
                        
                            
                                Document: Urinary antigen tests (UATs) are often used to diagnose Legionnaires’ disease as they are rapid and easy to perform on readily obtainable urine samples without the need for specialized skills compared to conventional methods. Recently developed automated readers for UATs may provide objective results interpretation, especially in cases of weak result bands. Using 53 defined patient urine samples, we evaluated the performance of the BinaxNOW Legionella Antigen Card (Abbott), ImmuView S. pneumoniae and Legionella (SSI Diagnostica), STANDARD F Legionella Ag FIA (SD Biosensor), and Sofia Legionella FIA (Quidel) simultaneously with their respective automated readers. Automatic and visual interpretation of result bands were also compared for the immunochromatography-based BinaxNOW and ImmuView UATs. Overall sensitivity and specificity of Legionella UATs were 53.9–61.5% and 90.0–94.9%, respectively. All four UATs successfully detected all samples from L. pneumophila serogroup 1-positive patients, but most failed to detect samples for Legionella spp., or other serogroups. Automatic results interpretation of results was found to be mostly concordant with visual results reading. In conclusion, the performance of the four UATs were similar to each other in the detection of Legionella urinary antigen with no major difference between automated or visual results reading.
 
  Search related documents: 
                                Co phrase  search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
 
                                Co phrase  search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date