Selected article for: "activity guidelines and lockdown period compare"

Author: D'Ovidio, Valeria; Lucidi, Cristina; Bruno, Giovanni; Lisi, Daniele; Miglioresi, Lucia; Bazuro, Marco Emilio
Title: Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on Colorectal Cancer Screening program
  • Cord-id: b1cd21qj
  • Document date: 2020_7_30
  • ID: b1cd21qj
    Snippet: INTRODUCTION: One of the main cluster of coronavirus-disease-2019 (COVID-19) has been identified in Italy. Following European and local guidelines, Italian Endoscopy Units modulated their activity. We aimed at analyzing need and safety to continue selective CRCS colonoscopies during COVID-19 pandemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective controlled cohort study in our “COVID-free” hospital to compare data of CRCS colonoscopies of the lockdown period (9(th) March-4(th) May 202
    Document: INTRODUCTION: One of the main cluster of coronavirus-disease-2019 (COVID-19) has been identified in Italy. Following European and local guidelines, Italian Endoscopy Units modulated their activity. We aimed at analyzing need and safety to continue selective CRCS colonoscopies during COVID-19 pandemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective controlled cohort study in our “COVID-free” hospital to compare data of CRCS colonoscopies of the lockdown period (9(th) March-4(th) May 2020) with those of the same period of 2019 (control group). A pre/post endoscopic sanitary surveillance for COVID-19 infection was organized for patients and sanitary staff. RESULTS: In the lockdown group, 60 out of 137 invited patients underwent endoscopy, whereas in the control group 238 CRCS colonoscopies (3.9-fold) were performed. In the lower number of examinations during the lockdown we found more colorectal cancers (5cases, 8%, vs 3cases,1%, p=0.002). The “high-risk” adenomas detection rate was also significantly higher in the “lockdown group” than in controls (47%vs25%,p=0.001). A multiple regression analysis selected relevant symptoms (HR3.1), familiarity (HR1.99) and lockdown-period (HR2.2) as independent predictors of high-risk lesions (high-risk adenomas and CRC). No COVID-19 infections were reported among staff and patients. CONCLUSIONS: The overall adherence to CRCS decreased during the pandemic, but the continuation of CRCS colonoscopies was anyway efficacious and safe.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abdominal pain and lockdown group: 1
    • abdominal pain and lockdown patient: 1, 2
    • abdominal pain and lockdown period: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • accurate definition and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • accurately study and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3
    • acute respiratory syndrome and adequate expertise: 1, 2, 3
    • acute respiratory syndrome and adherence rate: 1, 2
    • acute respiratory syndrome and lockdown group: 1
    • acute respiratory syndrome and lockdown patient: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • acute respiratory syndrome and lockdown period: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58
    • acute respiratory syndrome and lockdown period patient: 1, 2, 3
    • acute respiratory syndrome and lombardy northern region: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • acute respiratory syndrome and lymphatic vascular: 1, 2