Selected article for: "lockdown study and logistic regression"

Author: Prete, Melania; Luzzetti, Anna; Augustin, Livia S. A.; Porciello, Giuseppe; Montagnese, Concetta; Calabrese, Ilaria; Ballarin, Giada; Coluccia, Sergio; Patel, Linia; Vitale, Sara; Palumbo, Elvira; Celentano, Egidio; La Vecchia, Carlo; Crispo, Anna
Title: Changes in Lifestyle and Dietary Habits during COVID-19 Lockdown in Italy: Results of an Online Survey
  • Cord-id: b1hx8cxd
  • Document date: 2021_6_3
  • ID: b1hx8cxd
    Snippet: COVID-19 is an unprecedented global pandemic. On 12 March 2020, a lockdown order was issued in Italy in attempt to contain the health crisis. The study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on diet, physical activity, sleep quality, and distress in an Italian cohort. An online anonymous interview, which included validated questionnaires was created to compare lifestyle habits pre- and during the lockdown. Data analysis from 604 subjects with a mean age of 29.8 years was carried out
    Document: COVID-19 is an unprecedented global pandemic. On 12 March 2020, a lockdown order was issued in Italy in attempt to contain the health crisis. The study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on diet, physical activity, sleep quality, and distress in an Italian cohort. An online anonymous interview, which included validated questionnaires was created to compare lifestyle habits pre- and during the lockdown. Data analysis from 604 subjects with a mean age of 29.8 years was carried out using multivariate analysis. Compared to pre-COVID-19 times, 67% of people changed their eating habits and increased consumption of foods containing added sugars. Women and men with low adherence to the Mediterranean Diet (MedDiet) were more likely to be physically inactive (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.01, respectively). Results from logistic regression showed a three times higher risk of being inactive if adherence to the MedDiet was low (p < 0.0001), especially in men between 26 and 35 years. Lower levels of distress were reported in males who were physically active (89%) (p < 0.001). Our findings may help to identify effective lifestyle interventions during restrictive conditions.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • activity level and lockdown impact: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    • activity level and lockdown lifestyle change: 1
    • activity level and lockdown period: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • activity level and lockdown prior: 1, 2
    • activity level and lockdown prior period: 1
    • activity level and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
    • activity level and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • activity level and low adherence: 1
    • activity level and low distress: 1
    • activity level and low intake: 1, 2
    • activity level and low physical activity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37
    • activity level and low quality: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • activity level and low sleep quality: 1
    • activity level and lung disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5