Author: Christiansen, Christian Fynbo; Heideâ€Jørgensen, Uffe; Rasmussen, Thomas Bøjer; Bodilsen, Jacob; Søgaard, Ole Schmeltz; Maeng, Michael; Vistisen, Simon Tilma; Schmidt, Morten; PottegÃ¥rd, Anton; Lund, Lars Christian; Reilev, Mette; Hallas, Jesper; Johansen, Nanna Borup; Brun, Nikolai Constantin; Sørensen, Henrik Toft; Thomsen, Reimar Wernich
Title: Renin–Angiotensin System Blockers and Adverse Outcomes of Influenza and Pneumonia: A Danish Cohort Study Cord-id: d8hqazu2 Document date: 2020_10_1
ID: d8hqazu2
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Angiotensinâ€converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEâ€Is) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may worsen the prognosis of coronavirus disease 2019, but any association could be confounded by the cardiometabolic conditions indicating ACEâ€I/ARB use. We therefore examined the impact of ACEâ€Is/ARBs on respiratory tract infection outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: This cohort study included all adult patients hospitalized with influenza or pneumonia from 2005 to 2018 in Denmark using pop
Document: BACKGROUND: Angiotensinâ€converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEâ€Is) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may worsen the prognosis of coronavirus disease 2019, but any association could be confounded by the cardiometabolic conditions indicating ACEâ€I/ARB use. We therefore examined the impact of ACEâ€Is/ARBs on respiratory tract infection outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: This cohort study included all adult patients hospitalized with influenza or pneumonia from 2005 to 2018 in Denmark using populationâ€based medical databases. Thirtyâ€day mortality and risk of admission to the intensive care unit in ACEâ€Is/ARBs users was compared with nonusers and with users of calcium channel blockers. We used propensity scores to handle confounding and computed propensity scoreâ€weighted risks, risk differences (RDs), and risk ratios (RRs). Of 568 019 patients hospitalized with influenza or pneumonia, 100 278 were ACEâ€I/ARB users and 37 961 were users of calcium channel blockers. In propensity scoreâ€weighted analyses, ACEâ€I/ARB users had marginally lower 30â€day mortality than users of calcium channel blockers (13.9% versus 14.5%; RD, −0.6%; 95% CI, −1.0 to −0.1; RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93–0.99), and a lower risk of admission to the intensive care unit (8.0% versus 9.6%; RD, −1.6%; 95% CI, −2.0 to −1.2; RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.80–0.87). Compared with nonusers, current ACEâ€I/ARB users had lower mortality (RD, −2.4%; 95% CI, −2.8 to −2.0; RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.83–0.87), but similar risk of admission to the intensive care unit (RD, 0.4%; 95% CI, 0.0–0.7; RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00–1.09). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with influenza or pneumonia, ACEâ€I/ARB users had no increased risk of admission to the intensive care unit and slightly reduced mortality after controlling for confounding.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date