Selected article for: "liver metastasis and local recurrence"

Author: Odisio, Bruno C; Yamashita, Suguru; Huang, Steven Y; Kopetz, Scott E; Ahrar, Kamran; Mizuno, Takashi; Conrad, Claudius; Aloia, Thomas A; Chun, Yun Shin; Gupta, Sanjay; Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas
Title: Impact of Prior Hepatectomy History on Local Tumor Progression after Percutaneous Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases.
  • Cord-id: mz54p7sp
  • Document date: 2018_1_1
  • ID: mz54p7sp
    Snippet: PURPOSE To test the hypothesis that, given the current resection eligibility criteria for colorectal liver metastasis (CLM), prior hepatectomy would be associated with improved local tumor control and survival after percutaneous ablation of CLMs. MATERIALS AND METHODS This single-institution retrospective study included 82 consecutive patients with 97 CLMs treated with ablation (radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, or cryoablation) from January 2005 to December 2014. Local tumor progress
    Document: PURPOSE To test the hypothesis that, given the current resection eligibility criteria for colorectal liver metastasis (CLM), prior hepatectomy would be associated with improved local tumor control and survival after percutaneous ablation of CLMs. MATERIALS AND METHODS This single-institution retrospective study included 82 consecutive patients with 97 CLMs treated with ablation (radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, or cryoablation) from January 2005 to December 2014. Local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) at any organ, and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method from the time of ablation and compared between patients with (n = 49) and without (n = 33) prior hepatectomy. Cox regression models were used to identify LTPFS predictors. RESULTS Median overall follow-up period was 28 months (range, 4.5-132 months). Three-year actuarial LTPFS (patient level: 73% vs 34%, P < .001) was significantly higher in patients with than without prior hepatectomy, respectively. Similarly, 3-year RFS (23% vs 9.1%, P = .026) and OS (78% vs 48%, P = .003) were improved in patients with prior hepatectomy. At multivariate analysis, predictors of worse LTPFS were: no prior hepatectomy (hazard ratio [HR] 2.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-5.45; P = .045), minimal ablation margin < 5 mm (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.18-4.87; P = .016), and RAS-mutant tumor (HR 2.65, 95% CI 1.18-5.94; P = .019). CONCLUSIONS Prior hepatectomy for CLMs is associated with improved local tumor control after percutaneous ablation of post-resection-developed CLMs.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • ablation margin and ltpfs progression free survival: 1
    • ablation time and local tumor control: 1, 2
    • local tumor control and ltpfs progression free survival: 1, 2
    • local tumor ltpfs progression free survival and ltpfs progression free survival: 1, 2, 3, 4